Originally posted by Mr. Keni Styles
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Duran: In My Era, Mayweather Would've Been Ordinary
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostIt is ok, lmao. Those guys back then didn't know that they were fighting h.o.f's because we didn't know how Sugar, Duran or Hagler would pan out when they fought so your fool ass outlook is trashed. You're talking AFTER the fact. Floyd has fought tough fighters, they just weren't as good as the big 4. So what, this is his era. Nobody that he is accused of ducking could beat him. It's all accusations. Nobody screamed Mike McCallums name back then either when the big 4 were around. Didn't Mike deserve some love? Oh, no money in a fight with Mike right. Hypocrites.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostLegendary hall-of-famer Roberto "Hands of Stone" Duran does not believe Floyd Mayweather Jr. (44-0, 26KOs) would have been a force in his era, when fighters like Marvin Hagler, Thomas Hearns, Sugar Ray Leonard and Wilfred Benitez were on top. He says Mayweather would have been "just another guy in the bunch."
Duran is not impressed with Mayweather's level of competition, stating that there is no comparison between the top contenders of today and the fighters who ruled from junior welterweight to middleweight 30 years ago. Duran said Mayweather should have a loss on his record from the first fight with Jose Luis Castillo and he scored the fight with Oscar De La Hoya as a draw. [Click Here To Read More]Last edited by straightleft; 07-30-2013, 03:30 AM.
Comment
-
There's no doubting Floyd has talent, and is one of the best to have stepped in the ring of the past 15 years.
Problem is, in Duran's era.... it's very possible Floyd wouldn't have gone up to 147 with the like of SRL, Hearns, Benitez and the likes up there.
Ranking Floyd in Duran's era would have ONLY depended on who he beat. He could have all the talent in the world, but face it, if he doesn't beat any legitimate champs or elite challengers of the late 70s, early 80s by actually facing them, nobody would take notice.
Would the Floyd we know of this era, face the best of Duran's era?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by paul007 View PostDon't be upset...these guys make comments without even having seen any of these old time fights anyways. lol...
Anything that challenges God (Floyd) to these guys, and they come at you like you're an infidel.
Comment
-
-
The difference between Duran and Mayweather is Floyd had the discipline to stay at his best weight. Is he as great as Duran? No but near the end of Duran's career it was going quite pathetic for him. Prime Duran's lightweight reign was great
But there isn't a lightweight Duran beat that Floyd couldn't beat either. Dejesus would be a good match tho
Comment
-
Originally posted by 8thSamurai View PostThe difference between Duran and Mayweather is Floyd had the discipline to stay at his best weight. Is he as great as Duran? No but near the end of Duran's career it was going quite pathetic for him. Prime Duran's lightweight reign was great
But there isn't a lightweight Duran beat that Floyd couldn't beat either. Dejesus would be a good match tho
Comment
-
Originally posted by beez721 View Postcant see floyd beating srl. would be a good competitive fight though. I also think hearns would thrash floyd. that straight right was a killer
Does that make Duran ordinary as well?
Comment
Comment