Comments Thread For: Terrell Gausha Very Upset With Zimmerman Verdict

[joesaiditstrue]

You refuse to believe that trayvon was the one using self defense Zimmerman had no right to get in his face. So what do you mean by You lose? Blacks? You ****ing scum bag piece of trash.

lol he mad, not guilty.

[Russian Crushin]

I was interested as to how they determined the make-up of the jury. Is it entirely random, do they select on certain characteristics?

They basically needed people who didnt know about the case

[Weebler I]

Baited and executed? Way to sensationalize the event. Again the state has to prove he initially provoked the use of force against, yet there just isnt any, and in fact it seems like a case of self defense. Its not illegal to follow someone, so if martin attacked him for following him, then he was at fault

Yeah I don't think anyone should dispute the conclusion the jurors came to on the basis of the evidence presented. I don't think they had much option.

By all accounts half of the jurors felt GZ should receive some punishment but under the law they simply couldn't apply any.

[Frank Ducketts]

Once the kid was profiled on that dark, rainy night...he was dead. It happens all of the time. I knew he would get off. Anthony got off. I'm more surprised that GG was put down by a body shot. This isn't big news to you guys?

[Russian Crushin]

Don't give a damn, he still followed a 17 year old kid and shot him down after claiming it was "self defense". And it doesn't matter who told him not to follow Trayvon, it was still told to him and he didnt listen, period. That should have been the end of the case.

The dispatcher had no authority, and he also never said specifically not to follow. Its not illegal to follow.

Wtf was he getting attacked? That's right, he was following him and approached him as if he's a cop when he wasn't. And him thinking Trayvon was su****ious is why this thing stared in the first place. It's dark and you are being stalked in a car and the man gets out, what you do? I really wanna know your answer.

Again following is not illegal, if you cant understand that then you must have a very low IQ. You cant attack someone because they're following you

Yeah, based on the "evidence". If you believe that, then I'm pretty sure you believed that Martin was on top beating him up, when evidence proved that Martin didnt have any blood on his fingernails or anything to prove that he's the one that caused damage to Zimmermans nose and head. If anything, the "evidence" proved that Zimmerman caused the damage himself to cover up what he really did. Keep on believing "evidence" and not common sense.

A witness testified that he saw Martin was on top pounding on him. You talk about evidence but you're making a lot of it up, the evidence did not prove zimmerman caused the damage to himself to cover it up. Dont be a moron

[Russian Crushin]

Once the kid was profiled on that dark, rainy night...he was dead. It happens all of the time. I knew he would get off. Anthony got off. I'm more surprised that GG was put down by a body shot. This isn't big news to you guys?

Oj got off

[Pacquiao'd]

Baited and executed? Way to sensationalize the event. Again the state has to prove he initially provoked the use of force against, yet there just isnt any, and in fact it seems like a case of self defense. Its not illegal to follow someone, so if martin attacked him for following him, then he was at fault

well since the kid is dead there was no way to prove that, huh?

[Pacquiao'd]

Oj got off

Just like Zimm, Anthony and Blake - they are all murderers.

[bballchump11]

I feel his pain, but he doesn't need to blame the country as a whole. We have a system put in order to help protect citizens from getting harassed by the government and help us get a fair trial. This time it helped that ******* get away. Most of the time, they get it right, but in this instance they didn't.

I'd rather a guilty man go free than an innocent person go to jail. Zimmerman will still have to pay for his crimes

[Russian Crushin]

Yeah I don't think anyone should dispute the conclusion the jurors came to on the basis of the evidence presented. I don't think they had much option.

By all accounts half of the jurors felt GZ should receive some punishment but under the law they simply couldn't apply any.

Yes because there seems to be something wrong with following someone and then killing him. Most guys i know will also get into a fight if someone is following them, its a very threatening event. Thats probably why people are so upset, because the kid was minding him own business doing nothing wrong and was targeted, then killed