Comments Thread For: Terrell Gausha Very Upset With Zimmerman Verdict

[Mr.Fantastic]

Always the victim card. I'm glad none of them protesting losers without a job were blocking my way to work today.

If you really want to start and make an impact in fighting racism, you shouldn't be calling each other racist names all the damn time when saying hello and take em out your damn rap songs for starters.

[Weebler I]

This is by no means a racist post. but to other people talking about Blacks this or blacks that.. people have to realize

Europeans have super countries of their own. Germany,the UK, etcc.. Regardless of the current economic situations those are still considered 'super Countries'.

Asians have: South Korea, China, and Japan as their global super powers.

Hispanics/Latinos got a variety of big Countries as well.

Blacks got America. This is their country.They have no 'Black China' to go back to. They have no 'Black Germany'.. Don't even start with 'They got Africa' because it's not the same as Europe or China... the entire concept is different.

American Blacks have a right to complain and feel out raged because for them America is literally their only real homes. They got no Germany to go back to, they got no 'London' to go back to , they got no 'China or South Korea' to go back to. Nothing. No connections.

I'm sure I saw this in a comedy skit.

I don't know why you think white Americans have got 'Europe' to run to, most of them have no connection with Europe.

Two Zimmerman didn't know his race since he had his hoody up so he wasn't singling out Martin.

Not saying he was racial profiling but a hoody doesn't cover one's face completely, moreover I'm sure TM's hands were visible.

Anyone who thought Zimmerman would be found guilty by an all white jury in some little *** town in Florida was simply delusional

Why was it an all white jury anyway?

Trayvon Martin supporters = Flowmos

I don't know if "supporters" is the right term but daggum isn't a flomo, nor am I. This is about right and wrong in a general sense.

[Russian Crushin]

Robert Blake, Casey Anthony and Simpson werent found guilty either but we all know they committed murder, same with Zimmerman.

Their cases were completely different. Just because someone is found not guilty doesnt mean they didnt do it, thats why they are found "innocent". Zimmerman always has claimed to have killed him but the state could not prove that Zimmerman was the aggressor and at fault. With the evidence presented and witness report, there was no evidence without big holes that says he murdered him. Only 1 person knows the truth

[thuggery]

Why was it an all white jury anyway?

It wasn't. That's why I try to avoid speaking on the trial when it comes to ********. They'll say anything to suit their agenda, including blatant lies.

Most of the people in this thread didn't watch any part of the trial regardless.

[Pacquiao'd]

Their cases were completely different. Just because someone is found not guilty doesnt mean they didnt do it, thats why they are found "innocent". Zimmerman always has claimed to have killed him but the state could not prove that Zimmerman was the aggressor and at fault. With the evidence presented and witness report, there was no evidence without big holes that says he murdered him. Only 1 person knows the truth

He murdered him. We got Zimmermans side of the story when theres two others missing. Martins and the truth.

He baited that boy and executed him hence there being no signs of trauma or struggle on trayvons hands or body.

[Russian Crushin]

no one saw the fight start so that's bollocks. the only witness who heard the fight on the phone said zimmy started it. other witnesses say zimmy was on top and trayvon was screaming. you can't just believe who you want to and throw out the people you don't.

Exactly, which is why "just because it seems like Zimmy" is not a reason to convict. The screaming could not be determined for certain, some said it was one, some said the other. The parents and GF both said they didnt really know and it could have been zimmerman.

cognitive dissonance. look into it. the only true proof we have is zimmerman's enraged mental state 2 minutes before the murder saying how trayvon was a criminal that was getting away. in 2 minutes he went from enraged vigilante to peaceful man? why would anyone believe this?

Better question is why does any of that matter. Him being a paranoid about a possible criminal says nothing about who started the fight, which is basically what the state was trying to prove. The main investigator/cop said it appeared to be a case of self defense

[Weebler I]

It wasn't. That's why I try to avoid speaking on the trial when it comes to ********. They'll say anything to suit their agenda, including blatant lies.

Most of the people in this thread didn't watch any part of the trial regardless.

I was interested as to how they determined the make-up of the jury. Is it entirely random, do they select on certain characteristics?

[slicksouthpaw16]

The dispatcher isn't the police

Zimmerman didn't break any laws

Don't give a damn, he still followed a 17 year old kid and shot him down after claiming it was "self defense". And it doesn't matter who told him not to follow Trayvon, it was still told to him and he didnt listen, period. That should have been the end of the case.

He didn't shoot him because he was su****ious, he shot him because he was getting attacked. You people always leave that little detail out when describing what happened lol how convenient.

Wtf was he getting attacked? That's right, he was following him and approached him as if he's a cop when he wasn't. And him thinking Trayvon was su****ious is why this thing stared in the first place. It's dark and you are being stalked in a car and the man gets out, what you do? I really wanna know your answer.

There was no need to fight for his life. Based on the evidence presented, Trayvon was never forced to fight for his life. He chose to fight, and was in danger of killing Zimmerman before getting killed himself. That's what the evidence proved.

People don't seem to realize this never would have gone to trial if not for the public pressure.

Yeah, based on the "evidence". If you believe that, then I'm pretty sure you believed that Martin was on top beating him up, when evidence proved that Martin didnt have any blood on his fingernails or anything to prove that he's the one that caused damage to Zimmermans nose and head. If anything, the "evidence" proved that Zimmerman caused the damage himself to cover up what he really did. Keep on believing "evidence" and not common sense.

[Frank Ducketts]

I know you guys saw the video of GG being put down from a body shot. And this is Superman?

[Russian Crushin]

He murdered him. We got Zimmermans side to the story when theres two others missing. Martins and the truth.

He baited that boy and executed him hence there being no signs of trauma or struggle on trayvons hands or body.

Baited and executed? Way to sensationalize the event. Again the state has to prove he initially provoked the use of force against, yet there just isnt any, and in fact it seems like a case of self defense. Its not illegal to follow someone, so if martin attacked him for following him, then he was at fault