Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Broner Defeats Golovkin To Get WBA's Top June Honor

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
    Yes broner is a 3 time wba champ if I'm not mistaken. That's a big deal in the organization no doubt
    His two other titles were not WBA tho...WBO SFW and WBC LW

    Comment


    • #22
      I may be one of the only users on this site who is both an enormous fan of Golovkin and Broner lml. These wars will go on for years.

      Comment


      • #23
        They probably voted and made it official June 28th

        Comment


        • #24
          This is a bunch of bs...it's looking more and more like its who you know and who you're acquainted with that gives you recognition....broner is nothing but a puppet who gbp and haymon are building up. What elite fighter has he fought?? All been cherry picked...3 time world champion?? My eye!!

          Comment


          • #25
            ****ing favoritism bs

            Comment


            • #26
              What an incredibly ****** wrong choice that is. Unbelievable!!!

              Comment


              • #27
                Even tho he has canos belt

                Comment


                • #28
                  Adrien's pre-fight trash-talking brought out the best in Paulie Malignaggi we've ever seen. The Malignaggi who turned up to fight Broner would have schooled the likes of Maidana and Matthysse. The judge who scored the fight for Paulie can't tell the difference between a hit and a miss. Remember, Broner jumped 2 divisions and this was his first fight at 147.

                  Broner is still young and he's already become a world champion in 3 different weight classes. It's the WBA's job to know all this, and that's why the top honor goes to Adrien. Golovkin was still pretty impressive though.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by El Angel View Post
                    It shouldn't be about the significance though, it should be how you won and how you looked doing it, taking into account the caliber of the opponent. Pacquiao's win over Margarito was more significant than Floyd's over Marquez, was it better?
                    Did you really just say Pac's win over Margarito was more significant than Floyd's over JMM? I'm curious. How???

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by hitking View Post
                      Did you really just say Pac's win over Margarito was more significant than Floyd's over JMM? I'm curious. How???
                      His reason for Broner winning the title was that it was more significant because it was Broner's third belt in as many weight classes. That was Manny's 8th different weight class he won a title, so by his logic, Manny's victory was more significant than Floyd's.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP