If there's no fifth can we say JMM is ducking Manny

[2120]

They probly gonna fight if manny wins and marquez wins..with the belt on the line. But if they dnt u cant call marquez a duck, cuz he fought dis dude 4x and never gotte credit till now...and afterwards people accuse him of juicing..or after the 3rd fight accuse him of dirty foot moves..LOL.

But like i say...a 5th fight wud be alot of money, it most likely will happen

how can you ducked a guy that the majority of the media had you beating 3 times then go on in the fourth match to tuck him to sleep

What if this fight replicates the first three, a reporter asked both fighters last week. Would they be open to a fifth or sixth?
So, how about it?
"No," Pacquiao said. "After this, we are done."
Said Marquez, "This is the fight. Then it is over." source sports illustrated

[TOBYLEE1]

I wouldn't say it is a duck but he can return the favor cause Pac didn't have to fight him.

The third fight was the best financial option for Pac to fight Marquez. The fourth fight was also one of the best options and a way to redeem himself from the the win on the third fight which many didn't think he won.

The fourth fight Bradley wasn't an option cause he got robbed and there was no reason to rematch Tim

[Dunkeroo23]

Yea Marquez is totally ducking a guy who he arguably beat 4 straight times and knocked out cold.

- Pac fans logic

[brettWall]

lucky? Marquez had already dropped him hard in the third

timed and maneuvered him into that big right hand. that was a hard knockdown and then 3 rounds later he puts him to sleep

maybe being a pacfanactic is not allowing you to see how ******ed you and other pac fan boys sound that call that a lucky punch

describe the sequence of the fight not metioning the names to someone who hadnt seen it(that would be hard to find)

round one: not much happens boxer b wins the round

round two: not much happens boxer b wins the round

round 3: boxer A scores huge knockdown not many get up from that punch

round 4: not much happens boxer A wins the round

round 5: boxer b scores a knockdown that has more to do with their feet getting tangled but he also hurts boxer A to close the round big

round 6: boxer b is having success and momentum seems to be on his side but boxer A puts him down for the second time of the night but this time he is out cold

how much luck is their when you already demonstrated in the same fight that you can knock your opponent silly earlier then knock him out into next week a few rounds later

in case you forgot what happened see the sig below for a reference

There you go. What this guy is saying is, Pacquiao was destined to lose in that fight. JMM came in with all the tools and equipment and power to beat Pacquiao. No way Pacquiao will win that fight.

And that is that. How can you not accept this guy's argument? He's keeping it real.

[firstborn]

I don't have a link, but I'm sure I recall Marquez stating that the 4th fight would be the last time he pursued a fight with Pac no matter the outcome...........seems like he's just sticking to his word.

[John Barron]

Marquez didnt avoid Morales. Morales choose not to fight him he even admitted it.

"Morales is also very interested in a showdown with the lightweight world champion and countryman Juan Manuel Marquez. “I’ve been hearing in the news that Juan Manuel Marquez is interest in a rematch with Pacquiao, I don’t blame him. There were times I pushed back facing him when I had better proposals,” said Morales"

the hypocrisy of pacfans

1st and 2nd Marquez fights

pacfans: the knockdowns in those fights are the only thing that matters; not the punch stats or rounds won! pac knock Marquez down 4 times no way pac lost

3rd fight

pacfans: pac landed the most punches according to compubox. who cares if the 3rd fight with Marquez was voted the robbery of the year by the people; so what if the majority of media and most professional fighters had Marquez winning. The only opinion that matters are the judges!!!

bradley vs pac

pacfans: the judges got it wrong there opinion doesnt matter the people have spoken pac won this fight no matter what the record books will show! even the mayweathers said pac won

NEWSFLASH: the mayweathers said Marquez won the 3rd fight as well

Marquez vs pac IV

pacfans: knockdowns are not important pac won more rounds! pac was ahead when the fight was stopped!

pac was ahead by one point at the end of the fight! their was one second left in the fight with scores of 47-46 for pac. if their was just one second left in the 6th round we should just score the round

Marquez gets 10 points because he Knock pac the F out and how many points should pac get for sleeping? i would say zero

so if you score the 6th round its 56-47 for Marquez but scoring the 6th and the scoring of the fight pretty much became irrelevant when Marquez did what he did; check the sig below for a reference

this is the absolute truth. respect for expressing your own opinion.

any decent boxing fan who watched III once, twice, even three times saw a clear robbery. i tried having a boxing discussion about this with a stan one time but what i got in return was regurgitation of "facts", popular opinions, and "foot stomping tricks."

they're casuals, man.

also, anyone who watched the replay, i have a hunch that most people didn't, saw the bradley-pac fight a lot closer. it was a 115-113 type fight. it wasn't the "robbery of the century" it was made out to be by HBO, rosie o'donnell, skip bayless and pac's cultists.

[lparm]

I don't have a link, but I'm sure I recall Marquez stating that the 4th fight would be the last time he pursued a fight with Pac no matter the outcome...........seems like he's just sticking to his word.

That's horse**** and we both know it. If Manny won by decision you know JMM would've continued crying and begged for a 5th fight.

This story is only "ended" because JMM got his win. He's like that asshat kid that takes his ball and goes home when he finally scores a touchdown even though the other guy has scored several.

[bojangles1987]

I'm sick of watching these two fight. Yes, the 4th was awesome, if depressing as a Pac fan, but it was the perfect way for these two to walk away from each other for good. After 3 hotly disputed fights, we got a forever memorable KO.

These 2 don't have many fights left, and I want those fights to be against fighters they haven't fought, I want something new.

[T18Z]

this is the absolute truth. respect for expressing your own opinion.

any decent boxing fan. i tried ha who watched III once, twice, even three times saw a clear robberyving a boxing discussion about this with a stan one time but what i got in return was regurgitation of "facts", popular opinions, and "foot stomping tricks."

they're casuals, man.

also, anyone who watched the replay, i have a hunch that most people didn't, saw the bradley-pac fight a lot closer. it was a 115-113 type fight. it wasn't the "robbery of the century" it was made out to be by HBO, rosie o'donnell, skip bayless and pac's cultists.

Oh god, log off, you're clearly a casual who can't score for ****. Your opinion went out the window when you thought Bradley vs Pac was close, it also went out the window when 51 scored Pac and 57 scored Marquez... are you ******? Marquez fans will vote ANY of the fights a robbery, robbery is there favorite word ever since Marquez coined it after he ran out of the arena like a little girl, the man didn't accept any of his defeats, he's pathetic.

[John Barron]

i can see your emotions are running high right now. come back later when you want a decent conversation.