Is Tim Bradley a warrior?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mister Wolf
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2012
    • 7440
    • 242
    • 15
    • 107,507

    #31
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    It's quite sad that Alexander the Quitter is willing to face Khan with a Mayweather payday on the line. Whereas Bradley wasn't willing to.
    Just remember how easily Bradley handled Alexander when you see Khan getting his *** kicked.

    Comment

    • Ray Corso
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2012
      • 7988
      • 610
      • 0
      • 21,253

      #32
      Just woke up from a nap to read this and find out that ...Khan?...is a player?

      Damn how long was I sleeping? Since when does fighting Khan define a fighters legacy?
      Ray

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #33
        Originally posted by Mister Wolf
        Just remember how easily Bradley handled Alexander when you see Khan getting his *** kicked.
        Khan could get knocked out another 50 times and it will just make Bradley look even more pathetic for uttering the words "What if I lose to Amir Khan?"

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #34
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          It's the promoters job to get the fights though and you can't say that Shaw didn't get him good fights.

          Bradley didn't have any intentions of fighting Khan because he thought he might lose. You keep prattling on about the McCloskey fight as if it stopped Khan-Bradley happening when it didn't. Bradley wanted to fight bums until he got the Pac fight. In the words of Bradley - "I can fight anyone on HBO for $1.2m. Can a brother get a break?"

          Bradley is a bit like Mayweather in that his own words make his fans look like ******s.
          So when it fits your argument its the promoters job to get fights..Any other time its the fighter who should have done this or that..Shaw knew his contract with Bradley was coming to an end..Why did he not push for a June date, this is what I've been trying to say..Also why it shows Shaw was the reason this fight did not take place..Shaw thought he was slick..He just wanted Bradley to sign an extension..It back fired cause Dunkin had different plans for Bradley..Like I said, the fight should have happen within Bradley contacted time..Anything outside of that can't be consider a duck, it becomes who is offering the best option..It sure as hell was not Khan or Shaw..

          Comment

          • any craic lad?
            W-A-R
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 5338
            • 127
            • 51
            • 18,318

            #35
            Originally posted by mathed
            Khan wasn't worthy of a Bradley fight and his losses have shown that to be true. You can' increase your value by fighting subpar competition, which Khan clearly is.

            Pac ran away to fight JMM again when Bradley already had posters printed up for the rematch. Try something else next time.........
            This one always gets me majority off boxing fans had Marquez beating Manny and the majority again had Manny beating Bradley so how the hell can it be considered a duck when he rematchs the guy who gave him a far tougher fight?Anyway in rely to ops question yes Tim is a warrior and a good guy terrible all the crap he had too take post Manny for something the judges did

            Comment

            • Mister Wolf
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2012
              • 7440
              • 242
              • 15
              • 107,507

              #36
              Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
              So when it fits your argument its the promoters job to get fights..Any other time its the fighter who should have done this or that..Shaw knew his contract with Bradley was coming to an end..Why did he not push for a June date, this is what I've been trying to say..Also why it shows Shaw was the reason this fight did not take place..Shaw thought he was slick..He just wanted Bradley to sign an extension..It back fired cause Dunkin had different plans for Bradley..Like I said, the fight should have happen within Bradley contacted time..Anything outside of that can't be consider a duck, it becomes who is offering the best option..It sure as hell was not Khan or Shaw..
              Dirk knows all this Rome. When Bradley got the win over Pac his butthurt reached new levels. Dirk is good for the board though. He is the number one Bradley hater on the board and the bull**** he spews out is amusing.

              Comment

              • Rome-By-Ko
                The winner Is
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 20157
                • 323
                • 332
                • 29,833

                #37
                Originally posted by Ray Corso
                Just woke up from a nap to read this and find out that ...Khan?...is a player?

                Damn how long was I sleeping? Since when does fighting Khan define a fighters legacy?
                Ray
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                Khan could get knocked out another 50 times and it will just make Bradley look even more pathetic for uttering the words "What if I lose to Amir Khan?"
                Since this d1ck lick says so lol..

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                  So when it fits your argument its the promoters job to get fights..Any other time its the fighter who should have done this or that..Shaw knew his contract with Bradley was coming to an end..Why did he not push for a June date, this is what I've been trying to say..Also why it shows Shaw was the reason this fight did not take place..Shaw thought he was slick..He just wanted Bradley to sign an extension..It back fired cause Dunkin had different plans for Bradley..Like I said, the fight should have happen within Bradley contacted time..Anything outside of that can't be consider a duck, it becomes who is offering the best option..It sure as hell was not Khan or Shaw..
                  Push for the June date? HBO gave the date of July 23rd. You say this as if Bradley was going to fight Khan in June but not July...LOL. He wasn't going to fight Khan AT ALL. Whether he was with Shaw, without Shaw, in June, in July, in the US, UK or Mars....it didn't matter. He didn't want to fight Khan because it was too risky!

                  "Fight Amir Khan??!? Can a brother get a break?"

                  Comment

                  • Rome-By-Ko
                    The winner Is
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 20157
                    • 323
                    • 332
                    • 29,833

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    Push for the June date? HBO gave the date of July 23rd. You say this as if Bradley was going to fight Khan in June but not July...LOL. He wasn't going to fight Khan AT ALL. Whether he was with Shaw, without Shaw, in June, in July, in the US, UK or Mars....it didn't matter. He didn't want to fight Khan because it was too risky!

                    "Fight Amir Khan??!? Can a brother get a break?"
                    Wrong again..Bradley had a date in June with HBO dummy..Oh and he deserved a break,I mean Khan did fight McCloskey..

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                      Wrong again..Bradley had a date in June with HBO dummy..Oh and he deserved a break,I mean Khan did fight McCloskey..
                      Wrong about what?

                      Bradley had a guaranteed date with HBO where he could fight for 1.2m. He said himself that he'd rather fight a bum for 1.2m than fight Khan. That's what he meant by "Can a brother get a break?". Fighting Khan was too risky even though he would've got over 2m. He'd rather fight "anyone" for 1.2. His words.

                      You keep bringing up the McCloskey fight for some reason when it bares no relevance to the discussion.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP