Golovkin vs Macklin weigh in stare down (pic)

[BafanaBafana]

Golovkin is 5'11, end of story.

[rogdogx]

Golovkin is 5' 11, Macklin is good boy and Golovkin can make 154. That about sums it up. GGG by KO stoppage, get your popcorn ready

[Jloro]

lol Macklin made his neck look weird

[jaded]

Some pretty crazy arguments in this thread.

1st off...they are both 5' 10"...Macklin is in his socks and Golovkin is wearing runners probably adding a couple of inches.

2nd...up to 60% of the human adult body is water.

[IMG]http://i1343.***********.com/albums/o788/jadedz1/Untitled1_zpse2df1c7b.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i1343.***********.com/albums/o788/jadedz1/Untitled_zps69247d93.jpg[/IMG]

[vacon04]

Some pretty crazy arguments in this thread.

1st off...they are both 5' 10"...Macklin is in his socks and Golovkin is wearing runners probably adding a couple of inches.

2nd...up to 60% of the human adult body is water.

A couple of inches? Most runners have at most 12mm of heel elevation, which would be less than half an inch.

[jaded]

A couple of inches? Most runners have at most 12mm of heel elevation, which would be less than half an inch.

No...look at the pics I just uploaded from screen shots of the weighin...that's a couple of inches and if you don't believe me about their respective heights look it up on boxrec.

[Jloro]

Some pretty crazy arguments in this thread.

1st off...they are both 5' 10"...Macklin is in his socks and Golovkin is wearing runners probably adding a couple of inches.

2nd...up to 60% of the human adult body is water.

[IMG]http://i1343.***********.com/albums/o788/jadedz1/Untitled1_zpse2df1c7b.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i1343.***********.com/albums/o788/jadedz1/Untitled_zps69247d93.jpg[/IMG]

Nice job finding the feet pictures some how lol. That settles one strange argument

[DoktorSleepless]

Why the **** are people arguing over a 1 inch height difference?

[vacon04]

No...look at the pics I just uploaded from screen shots of the weighin...that's a couple of inches and if you don't believe me about their respective heights look it up on boxrec.

Some Asics shoes ... they have an elevation of like an inch, maybe a little bit more (1.1 or 1.2 inches) but not 2 inches.

[jaded]

Nice job finding the feet pictures some how lol. That settles one strange argument

The video is over here...

http://www.boxingscene.com/video-gennady-golovkin-vs-matthew-macklin-weigh---67131

I paused it and took a screen shot and uploaded it...

Some Asics shoes ... they have an elevation of like an inch, maybe a little bit more (1.1 or 1.2 inches) but not 2 inches.

I don't know why you are arguing...you can see how much taller he looks and you can see their actual heights on boxrec which has Golovkin at 5' 9 1/2"...Wikipedia has him at 5'10" and boxrec has Macklin at 5' 10" there is really nothing to argue about.