Does this now take away from Raheem's victory?

[Guest]

** Sure, now I voted for Shrububbya because some of UK's underclass ain't got enough cents to make change. Whatever blows your skirt up sweetie!

Why are all your posts prefixed by "**"? Is that some kind of batty boy thing or what?

Doublya sucks ****.

[Guest]

So... does this development now retrospectively taint Zahir's points defeat over Morales, given that it suggests Morales has been on the slide?

[LondonRingRules]

So... does this development now retrospectively taint Zahir's points defeat over Morales, given that it suggests Morales has been on the slide?

** No, Raheem is a talented fighter working hard to get respect which he earned over Morales. This is the same Morales who did a good job against Manny in the first fight just before Raheem got him. Morales just got a better prepared Manny in the rematch.

[Guest]

** No, Raheem is a talented fighter working hard to get respect which he earned over Morales. This is the same Morales who did a good job against Manny in the first fight just before Raheem got him. Morales just got a better prepared Manny in the rematch.

Thankyou. You see how easy it is to discuss it civilly?

[STEELHEAD]

He's done though, right? At that level, at least.

i would think morales is relagated to fighting tough up and comers .even tho i think eric is still a top contender there's less status now for belt holders to want to fight him. but i do see there being enough general public money there to maybe warrant other silly rematches with the opponents he's lost to when those opponents are on the way back down after they loose their belts.