I would say either Paulie or Shane. Sure Shane wasn't at his absolute prime, but he wasn't too far from it and was still a beast. I mean he sodomized Margarito after the Cotto fight, that's saying quite a bit.
Shane was well past his prime. People seem to forget the Mayorga fight where he looked horrendeous
The win over Mosley. Mosley was still quite relevant back then and Cotto toughed it out in a good, close fight.
The only people who think the Margarito rematch means anything are Cotto fanatics. He was fighting a dead man with one eye and wasn't even that convincing.
antonio margarito ruined him. he was never the same after their fight in '08, when margs was at the height of his powers, and almost certainly cheating under capetillo.
Cotto has skills but I always thought he was an over-achiever.
I didn't expect him to beat Mosley and he did by a slim margin in an exciting fight. That actually was the fight that brought him fame.
He continually took tough guys that others wouldn't fight.
He failed in his biggest fights. The only fight he was not competetive was in the Pac fight.
I agree with most of the post except the bold because I agree partially with that. I think that fight was a great, competitive fight through the first 5 rounds.
Also, marg2 and mayorga..... come on... Margarito had just had a beating of a lifetime and mayorga hadn't fought in quite some time, and cotto didn't look outstanding in either of those fights
He did not look outstanding. I guess winning almost every round is not outstanding enough?
Lol at a shot one eyed margarito being a career defining win. On top of that it was fought at a catchweight. If thats your best win you must not have very good wins
Comment