Broner, not including his last performance. Even though broner is a Floyd wanna be, broner is a funnier trash talker. He is pretty funny, although goofy.
Who is more exciting, Broner or Floyd?
Collapse
-
Broner is more offensive-minded, so he'll usually provide more entertaining performances. I find Mayweather's defensive ability to be entertaining though. Once Broner starts fighting tougher competition, we'll see if he can stay entertaining.Comment
-
Broner has a more exciting style. He stands right in front of his opponent and doesn't use his feet/movement for defense. Plus, he throws nice crisp combinations. I think he will be in some wars at 147 if he doesn't adjust his style any.
However, I would choose to watch Floyd any day over Broner. There are so many facets to his game. Its really a joy to watch. We've seen him in exciting fights like N'dou, Corley, Augustus and Cotto. We've seen utterly dominating performances such as Corrales, Hernandez and Marquez. He can give his opponents so many different looks. Floyd has walked fighters down, fought off the ropes, used his legs and movement, and fought in the pocket. He dictates the pace and style of the fight.
One criticism of Floyd though is that he doesn't throw combinations as much as in the past. These days he rather throw right hand leads and pot shot. I like the days when he threw hooks to the body and mixed his punches up well. We kind of had a flash back in the Cotto fight but Cotto's defense was pretty tight.Comment
Comment