I am talking excitement, delivering the fans an entertaining fight.
Who is more exciting, Broner or Floyd?
Collapse
-
Neither.
I don't find overly-defensive feather-fisted pussies who just try to win decisions to be exciting.
I'd sooner watch skilled punchers (Kovalev, Golovkin, M Garcia, Matthysse) who try to stop their opponents.Comment
-
stroke guy can come get some
I wouldn't say Broner is defensive though. He blocks but is still in range.
Where's Maidana?Comment
-
mayweather, although it got a little boring later in the guerrero fight, i dont really understand this boring talk
he's pretty exciting to watch, although i'd like someone more of his match in the ring
broner doesn't have the same level of skills or flashiness as floyd, so i find him kind of boringComment
-
He is using the jab and more skills lately. The way he fought Lopez and Soto Karass looked a much calmer and thinking fighter.Originally posted by Freedom2013Not my kind of fighter. He's aggressive but not really a skilled puncher like Matthysse and Golovkin.
Floyd needs people on his level to be exciting I agree. Cotto and Hatton were exciting.mayweather, although it got a little boring later in the guerrero fight, i dont really understand this boring talk
he's pretty exciting to watch, although i'd like someone more of his match in the ring
broner doesn't have the same level of skills or flashiness as floyd, so i find him kind of boring
However Broner's flaws are exciting. He gets hit but always fights back. He doesn't back pedal.
Floyd has been in boring fights. Baldo, Oscar, Guerrero and some say Mosely.Comment
-
Floyd is very interesting to watch, which makes him entertaining in my book. I'm not a fan, but the guy is simply impressive. He does things that very few fighters can do, or have ever done.mayweather, although it got a little boring later in the guerrero fight, i dont really understand this boring talk
he's pretty exciting to watch, although i'd like someone more of his match in the ring
broner doesn't have the same level of skills or flashiness as floyd, so i find him kind of boring
Broner's an imitation. He's got talent and skills, but he doesn't impress anything like Mayweather. Broner's already looking like his success at the lower weights was significantly aided by fighting naturally smaller men.Comment
-
Don't look at Broner as if he is an imitation. You rarely get an imitation better than the original. Broner is lil Bro and has a different style to Big Bro AKA Floyd Mayweather. He uses some of Mayweather's style but is much more settled in his shots. In fact he is much more confident than Mayweather age for age in terms of going out to clubs, interviews etc...Floyd is very interesting to watch, which makes him entertaining in my book. I'm not a fan, but the guy is simply impressive. He does things that very few fighters can do, or have ever done.
Broner's an imitation. He's got talent and skills, but he doesn't impress anything like Mayweather. Broner's already looking like his success at the lower weights was significantly aided by fighting naturally smaller men.Comment
-
Broner indeed has a somewhat different style, but he's clearly modeled after his idol. And, no way is Broner better than Mayweather.Don't look at Broner as if he is an imitation. You rarely get an imitation better than the original. Broner is lil Bro and has a different style to Big Bro AKA Floyd Mayweather. He uses some of Mayweather's style but is much more settled in his shots. In fact he is much more confident than Mayweather age for age in terms of going out to clubs, interviews etc...Comment
Comment