Clip: Manny KO's Eric Morales

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ( do )
    Pinoy and Proud
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2004
    • 2042
    • 646
    • 659
    • 10,456

    #41
    Originally posted by Bozo_no no
    In the rounds he didn't end up on his ass three times.

    You have zero logic here.

    The three knock downs DID happen, and they effect the scoring.

    How it's remembered in your mind has no effect on reality.
    ignore him bro..

    he's just hard hard-headed or simply dumb to accept the facts you are mentioning..

    Comment

    • E=MC2
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2006
      • 415
      • 38
      • 34
      • 6,749

      #42
      Originally posted by Bozo_no no
      In the rounds he didn't end up on his ass three times.

      You have zero logic here.

      The three knock downs DID happen, and they effect the scoring.

      How it's remembered in your mind has no effect on reality.

      If 3 KDs had happenned in different rounds, I would have put some weight on them.

      Comment

      • E=MC2
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2006
        • 415
        • 38
        • 34
        • 6,749

        #43
        Originally posted by do
        ignore him bro..

        he's just hard hard-headed or simply dumb to accept the facts you are mentioning..

        Namecalling is usually the last resort of the side that is loosing the argument.

        Comment

        • sane0t0
          Up and Comer
          • May 2004
          • 71
          • 3
          • 3
          • 6,398

          #44
          Originally posted by E=MC2
          So can JMM, don't you think?
          Yes, and that's what makes a rematch very intriguing. I definately think it could be a pick-em type fight. Much like this was with the pre-fight predictions, etc.

          JMM is a boxer, so he will be technical in fighting and always be able to adjust. I'm just saying the 1-D argument doesn't hold, IMO. He showed that he can make adjustments too, which would make for a very interesing fight. But if I had to predict the outcome in a rematch, I'd go with KO for Manny. Manny's power in both his right and left would be too much for JMM. JMM can't just avoid the left straight to time his counter.
          What do you think of this?


          However, IMO Manny should be looking to MAB first, then JMM after.

          Comment

          • sane0t0
            Up and Comer
            • May 2004
            • 71
            • 3
            • 3
            • 6,398

            #45
            Double post deleted
            Last edited by sane0t0; 01-22-2006, 03:11 AM.

            Comment

            • E=MC2
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 415
              • 38
              • 34
              • 6,749

              #46
              Originally posted by sane0t0
              Yes, and that's what makes a rematch very intriguing. I definately think it could be a pick-em type fight. Much like this was with the pre-fight predictions, etc.

              JMM is a boxer, so he will be technical in fighting and always be able to adjust. I'm just saying the 1-D argument doesn't hold, IMO. He showed that he can make adjustments too, which would make for a very interesing fight. But if I had to predict the outcome in a rematch, I'd go with KO for Manny. Manny's power in both his right and left would be too much for JMM. JMM can't just avoid the left straight to time his counter.
              What do you think of this?


              However, IMO Manny should be looking to MAB first, then JMM after.
              excellent points; let's hope the rematch happens

              Comment

              • Bozo_no no
                Palabras de Piedra
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 8906
                • 416
                • 496
                • 16,069

                #47
                Originally posted by E=MC2
                If 3 KDs had happenned in different rounds, I would have put some weight on them.

                I don't really care what you put weight on.

                We are talking about the score, and no matter what you've convinced yourself of, you don't change the fact there WERE three KD's in the 1st round, and that it was a 10-6 round that the judge admitted he got wrong, and that the correction would have had Manny winning.

                I see what you're trying to say, but it's not logical.

                Comment

                • E=MC2
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 415
                  • 38
                  • 34
                  • 6,749

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Bozo_no no
                  I don't really care what you put weight on.

                  We are talking about the score, and no matter what you've convinced yourself of, you don't change the fact there WERE three KD's in the 1st round, and that it was a 10-6 round that the judge admitted he got wrong, and that the correction would have had Manny winning.

                  I see what you're trying to say, but it's not logical.

                  First, I see what you are trying to say, but you can not change the score now. The D is a D.

                  Second, the assertion that JMM was a better boxer in that fight is logically sound, as is the assertion that Pacman was a better puncher.

                  Comment

                  • Bozo_no no
                    Palabras de Piedra
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 8906
                    • 416
                    • 496
                    • 16,069

                    #49
                    Originally posted by E=MC2
                    First, I see what you are trying to say, but you can not change the score now. The D is a D.

                    Second, the assertion that JMM was a better boxer in that fight is logically sound, as is the assertion that Pacman was a better puncher.
                    That doesn't change what the correct score should have been.

                    Fights aren't rated on who individuals thought had better attributes in particular fights.

                    The bottom line is Marquez escaped with a draw in that fight because a judge made an error on his score card.

                    That's what you incorrectly disagreed with in the 1st place.

                    Comment

                    • E=MC2
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 415
                      • 38
                      • 34
                      • 6,749

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Bozo_no no
                      That doesn't change what the correct score should have been.

                      Fights aren't rated on who individuals thought had better attributes in particular fights.

                      The bottom line is Marquez escaped with a draw in that fight because a judge made an error on his score card.

                      That's what you incorrectly disagreed with in the 1st place.
                      Legally speaking, the judge did not make a mistake.

                      The rest matters little to me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP