Broner won close but comfortable imo but...

[stefl14]

...the kid is garbage. People try to compare this clown to Mayweather which is quite frankly laughable. It's embarrassing that this idiot can be called a 3 division champion. Nobody can bring size into this because Broner is bigger than Manny and Floyd and Malignaggi. I think Floyd beats 2009 Manny by a close decision but I think Pac at that time would have absolutely Murdered Broner. He had the perfect style to do it against this stationary moron. That really tells you the gulf between Broner and Floyd. Countless fighters have looked better against Malignaggi than Broner. Hatton looked a lot better, Khan looked a lot better and Cotto looked a lot better, even though Khan is an absolute bum according to most of you people. I'm telling you there are so many guys would murder this idiot.

[Jam Jars]

His terrible defence and slow feet make him a KO waiting to happen against a decent fighter with power.

[Mike D]

...the kid is garbage. People try to compare this clown to Mayweather which is quite frankly laughable. It's embarrassing that this idiot can be called a 3 division champion. Nobody can bring size into this because Broner is bigger than Manny and Floyd and Malignaggi. I think Floyd beats 2009 Manny by a close decision but I think Pac at that time would have absolutely Murdered Broner. He had the perfect style to do it against this stationary moron. That really tells you the gulf between Broner and Floyd. Countless fighters have looked better against Malignaggi than Broner. Hatton looked a lot better, Khan looked a lot better and Cotto looked a lot better, even though Khan is an absolute bum according to most of you people. I'm telling you there are so many guys would murder this idiot.

Yes, he murders him. Wins every single round (EVERY SINGLE ONE) or flat out stops him.

Broner is a B fighter. Has the ability to beat other B fighters (or lose to them), can demolish C fighters, but really has little to no chance against any A fighter. The talk that he's the next big thing in boxing, or that he's a P4P guy is ludicrous.

[M Bison]

I certainly don't believe he won...
I will re-watch the fight but when you're the champion you've already proven everything, Broners the champion so why did he get the benefit of the doubt?
Usual BS from Showtime instead of Broner is getting hit with an awful lot of shots
"those are just pitty pat shots"
"wow look how amazing Broner absorbs those punches"
"Power"
Here was me thinking If you were hitting a guy that counts as scoring and I'm very sure Malignaggi was hitting Broner alot!

[M Bison]

Yes, he murders him. Wins every single round (EVERY SINGLE ONE) or flat out stops him.

Broner is a B fighter. Has the ability to beat other B fighters (or lose to them), can demolish C fighters, but really has little to no chance against any A fighter. The talk that he's the next big thing in boxing, or that he's a P4P guy is ludicrous.

Lets see him put his money where his mouth is and prove that statement he made about Matthysse.

[Mike D]

Lets see him put his money where his mouth is and prove that statement he made about Matthysse.

Broner is a f**king idiot. He won't get near Matthysse. Won't get within 10 football fields of him. In fact him and Haymon will probably file a restraining order just thinking about him.

[Jam Jars]

I certainly don't believe he won...
I will re-watch the fight but when you're the champion you've already proven everything, Broners the champion so why did he get the benefit of the doubt?
Usual BS from Showtime instead of Broner is getting hit with an awful lot of shots
"those are just pitty pat shots"
"wow look how amazing Broner absorbs those punches"
"Power"
Here was me thinking If you were hitting a guy that counts as scoring and I'm very sure Malignaggi was hitting Broner alot!

I agree, if a punch has no effect they are worth the same as the other guys that has no effect, they aren't worth more because you believe they are harder.

[stefl14]

I agree, if a punch has no effect they are worth the same as the other guys that has no effect, they aren't worth more because you believe they are harder.

Even though I dislike Broner I do disagree. Harder punches count for more imo. It depends on how you score a fight but the vast majority of judges account for power. Even if you score on power this fight was close, which shows that Broner is basically garbage because even though Paulie is decent he has no power. Everyone calls Khan a bum but who looked better vs Paulie by a long way? If Khan wasn't chinny he'd be much better than Broner even though he has serious defensive flaws.

[Jam Jars]

Even though I dislike Broner I do disagree. Harder punches count for more imo. It depends on how you score a fight but the vast majority of judges account for power. Even if you score on power this fight was close, which shows that Broner is basically garbage because even though Paulie is decent he has no power. Everyone calls Khan a bum but who looked better vs Paulie by a long way? If Khan wasn't chinny he'd be much better than Broner even though he has serious defensive flaws.

Boxing is judged on "effective punching" if there's no effect why is the punch worth more because it's harder?

[stefl14]

Boxing is judged on "effective punching" if there's no effect why is the punch worth more because it's harder?

Just because a guy isn't visibly hurt it doesn't mean a hard punch isn't taking its toll. Who do you think lost more brain cells in that fight?? Trust me virtually all professional judges will disagree with you.