And all I'm saying is that the ranking you're basing your argument on is a mere opinion. And fact is, its an opinion that's in the minority and doesn't reflect how that era of boxing will be viewed by the majority.
BTW, speaking of Ring magazine pre-Oscar. When they put in their championship policy back in 2002, they recognized 4 champions immediately. Lennox Lewis, Roy Jones, Bernard Hopkins, and Kostya Tsyzu. Although I liked their policy and still do despite changes, IMO they lost a lil credibility even then recognizing RJ as light heavy champ when Darius Mickelcheski was the lineal champ. Which again points to the ratings simply being a couple guys' opinions, not anything concrete or official like you're making them out to be.
BTW, speaking of Ring magazine pre-Oscar. When they put in their championship policy back in 2002, they recognized 4 champions immediately. Lennox Lewis, Roy Jones, Bernard Hopkins, and Kostya Tsyzu. Although I liked their policy and still do despite changes, IMO they lost a lil credibility even then recognizing RJ as light heavy champ when Darius Mickelcheski was the lineal champ. Which again points to the ratings simply being a couple guys' opinions, not anything concrete or official like you're making them out to be.
They take whatever they can get because they only have a few yrs left at the top.
Comment