The 26-0 Record Thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • secondsin
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 229
    • 8
    • 22
    • 6,410

    #1

    The 26-0 Record Thread

    Wow,8 fighters holds the record 26-0.

    Andre Ward 14 KO
    Adrien Broner 22 KO
    Abner Mares 14 KO
    Gennady Golovkin 23 KO
    Danny Garcia 16 KO
    Alexander Povetkin 18 KO
    Nathan Cleverly 12 KO
    Carlos Buitrago 16 KO

    Who's the most impressive?(GG obviously imo)
    And is their anymore 26-0 fighters.
    Just added 3 more.
    53
    Andre Ward
    58.49%
    31
    Adrien Broner
    0.00%
    0
    Abner Mares
    11.32%
    6
    Gennady Golovkin
    20.75%
    11
    Danny Garcia
    9.43%
    5
    Last edited by secondsin; 06-14-2013, 02:27 PM.
  • Jloro
    Invicta
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2012
    • 6930
    • 258
    • 811
    • 15,033

    #2
    You think GGG has a better record than ward? That is kind of sad man.

    Look what Ward has done, more than compared to all of the others compared.

    Comment

    • dan_cov
      Zombie Taylor
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2011
      • 24825
      • 3,310
      • 3,330
      • 145,001

      #3
      Povetkin & Cleverly.

      Comment

      • sicko
        The Truth Hurts
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2010
        • 34211
        • 2,594
        • 839
        • 151,307

        #4
        1. Andre Ward
        2. Abner Mares

        Their resumes separates them from the rest! And both basically cleaned out their Division with a Tournament. The others are good fighters no doubt but most of them have very average resumes at the moment and/or haven't truly been tested yet.

        Comment

        • Seiko
          Interim Champion
          • Aug 2008
          • 601
          • 18
          • 100
          • 7,122

          #5
          A good question would be, Who if any of them will lose first?

          And Ward is probably the most impressive do to his resume, and the one I can see being NO. 1 P4P for years.

          Comment

          • secondsin
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 229
            • 8
            • 22
            • 6,410

            #6
            Originally posted by S31KOU
            A good question would be, Who if any of them will lose first?

            And Ward is probably the most impressive do to his resume, and the one I can see being NO. 1 P4P for years.
            I was gonna ask that but Austin Trout was also 26-0 and already lost
            so i went with the most impressive.

            Comment

            • DosRounds
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2013
              • 2990
              • 258
              • 557
              • 10,414

              #7
              Ward has cleaned out his division. Mares is a second. The others are way below

              Comment

              • Public_Enemy
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2013
                • 3486
                • 121
                • 548
                • 11,019

                #8
                1. Ward 2. Mares and then there's the rest of them. Both Ward and Mares have proven themselves against top opposition. They've accomplished a lot in less than 30 fights.

                Comment

                • Ringlife
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 5861
                  • 64
                  • 49
                  • 12,524

                  #9
                  Andre Ward no doubt.

                  Comment

                  • Ray Corso
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 7988
                    • 610
                    • 0
                    • 21,253

                    #10
                    Boxing is NOT a numbers game! Its a NAME game!!!!! 26-0 sounds pretty good but what names have contibuted to the 0?
                    26-0 fighting hand selected "opponents" isn't very impessive especially if the "undefeated one" has some talent!! Mst all of the fans favorites records have been built up with trial horses and low to no talents to give the fans a chance to "pick their winner"! 26-0 just looks better than 19-4 but if that 4 was against quality talent its ofcourse more meaningfull than the 0!!!!
                    Picking out lesser talented oppononents or fellows who have no power or the old veteran whose looking for a few more dollars takes knowledge!
                    Ofcourse if you can't see the lack of talent or the situation of others try to survive you would be impressed with the numbers. WOW 26-0 impressive!!
                    HA!!! Ray.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP