I'm gonna say Dirrell.
Gamboa is a very explosive fighter and has good skills. Sometimes he looks really good but sometimes he looks ordinary. He's very inconsistent with his performances.
Guzman is just lazy and lacks discipline. He had great talent but you can say that about a lot fighters. He just didn't give a **** about training, like an elite fighter should.
Kirkland is an exciting brawler and a strong puncher, but doesn't have the skills to be the best or one of the best.
I think Dirrell has it all. Great skills, speed, timing, footwork and power. I think he can be the best supermiddleweight in the world, but he lacks the mental strength and passion to be the best. I think he's just happy that his buddy Andre Ward is the best at 168. Also I thought that Dirrell clearly beat Froch.
Gamboa is a very explosive fighter and has good skills. Sometimes he looks really good but sometimes he looks ordinary. He's very inconsistent with his performances.
Guzman is just lazy and lacks discipline. He had great talent but you can say that about a lot fighters. He just didn't give a **** about training, like an elite fighter should.
Kirkland is an exciting brawler and a strong puncher, but doesn't have the skills to be the best or one of the best.
I think Dirrell has it all. Great skills, speed, timing, footwork and power. I think he can be the best supermiddleweight in the world, but he lacks the mental strength and passion to be the best. I think he's just happy that his buddy Andre Ward is the best at 168. Also I thought that Dirrell clearly beat Froch.
Comment