Anybody else thought Trout beat Canelo?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Yogi007
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jul 2011
    • 758
    • 16
    • 106
    • 6,944

    #41
    I personally thought the fight should have been a draw.

    Comment

    • El Angel
      Team Cotto
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 20795
      • 495
      • 382
      • 29,430

      #42
      The KD sealed it for Canelo, he won that fight.

      Comment

      • Rysandro
        Contender
        • May 2012
        • 154
        • 7
        • 0
        • 6,213

        #43
        Your scorecard is wrong, so..

        /thread

        Comment

        • lefthook2daliva
          huh?
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 5569
          • 190
          • 594
          • 18,317

          #44
          Originally posted by Jloro
          and Bhop won that toooo.../
          Nah dood. I am by NO means any kind of fan that in any way shape or form might admire Calzaghe. But he won that fight. Much as I hate to admit it and give a lil' sugar to some of Calzaghe's more slobberingly moronic, jingoistic, babosote, fans.

          Wish he had.

          Comment

          • humanpunchingbg
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 460
            • 16
            • 9
            • 6,613

            #45
            Originally posted by Derailed
            Only difference is that ten years from now, nobody will be crying like children over the Canelo-Trout fight.

            To this day you have butt-hurt, grown men throwing tantrums over Floyd v Castillo in 2001

            Its pathetic.

            That said, I didn't see the Canelo Trout fight. I'll watch it later.
            I don't blame them. Floyd markets himself as being undefeated and unbeatable. Boxing casuals(the majority of Floyd's PPV buyer$) don't know about him receiving a gift against Castillo. The only difference the Castillo and Trout "robbery" was that Trout knew he would have to take it to Alvarez to win. He didn't.

            Comment

            • $mannyFresh
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jul 2011
              • 562
              • 17
              • 3
              • 7,544

              #46
              The fight was close because Canelo was toying with Trout.

              I just hope Canelo comes differently in September.

              Comment

              • Vasyl’s dad
                He said no rematch
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 23510
                • 1,120
                • 1,945
                • 50,072

                #47
                If Trout beat Canelo that night, surely, and without a shred of doubt, Castillo won the first go around with Floyd.

                Comment

                • Redd Foxx
                  Hittin' the heavy bag.
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 22007
                  • 1,180
                  • 2,316
                  • 1,257,197

                  #48
                  I thought Trout was robbed. He barely did **** in the fight but 20
                  jabs means more to me than 2 or 3 power punches so I just couldn't give most of those rounds to Canelo because it just wasn't enough.

                  Comment

                  • noStylez
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 2770
                    • 41
                    • 4
                    • 16,161

                    #49
                    I had Trout winning but could have gone either way or a draw. I wouldn't mind a rematch though.

                    Comment

                    • TheGR8TESTOAT
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 7022
                      • 371
                      • 573
                      • 131,460

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Halls of Fame
                      We are hearing now from a lot of people that Floyd vs Canelo is "the fight of the century". Well, I see it like this: Canelo never fought a prime, top opponent until Trout, so Trout was the first BIG test for him; and on my scorecard Trout won this fight. Only by 1 point, but still he won.
                      So - Floyd vs Canelo can be sold by the media as such a big fight for only one reason: because both have a lot of PPV buyers.
                      Anybody wanting to tell me Canelo is a top 40 p4p fighter at this point has got to be joking.
                      I see it like this: Canelo is physically bigger than Floyd, actually he is the first natural light middleweight Floyd will be facing (Oscar and Cotto came from much lower weight classes when they fought Floyd at 154).
                      But as far as I am concerned, Canelo is a good fighter who never fought ANYBODY in his prime except Trout who he lost to.
                      Green K bro! I too had Trout winning the fight by exactly 1 point as well!

                      But the fact that I had him winning by just 1 point means it was still close and all fights can go either way if its only a few points variance so to speak.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP