Comments Thread For: Ward's Trainer: Carl Froch Owes Smoger An Apology

[Hitman932]

You're right. It's still on google search, the thread title was...

"Froch's son will question his backbone".

Yes it's on google search. Under boxingscene and not a word about it anywhere else on the internet.

The article was taken down because it was unsubstantiated bull**** and probably completely made up by one of the fake ass wannabe journalists that contribute garbage to this site.

Anyone who thinks that thread was taken down for any other reason than it was completely made up is a ******.

There are a million inflammatory statements over the course of the year and boxingscene never takes them down - you guys need to start using your brains instead of hearing what you want to hear.

Bull**** like that would never get posted in the first place if there weren't a bunch of suckers on this site dumb enough to fall for it.

[Weebler I]

Seems very out of character for him

Really though? This is the guy who inferred Dawson was an Uncle Tom and started asking him whether he was going to let a white man speak for him.

The guy wouldn't even get into the ring to work Khan's corner between rounds.

[Weebler I]

The article was taken down because it was unsubstantiated bull**** and probably completely made up by one of the fake ass wannabe journalists that contribute garbage to this site.

You don't know why it was taken down any more than I do, why pretend otherwise? We do know the thread title was in quotes and apparently posted by Boxingscene itself.

[Wenger Is God]

Really though? This is the guy who inferred Dawson was an Uncle Tom and started asking him whether he was going to let a white man speak for him.

The guy wouldn't even get into the ring to work Khan's corner between rounds.

Didn't know he said that about Dawson. Whenever I've seen Hunter, he seems calm and very respectful.

I don't think the Khan corner thing is relevant but that did piss me off a bit!

[Sosay]

Wait, so Cortez is corrupt because he wouldn't let hatton do his thing (holding)? Now smog is corrupt because he tells fighters to fight out?
Damn I like Froch but his excuses are starting to make me dislike him.

[Hitman932]

You don't know why it was taken down any more than I do, why pretend otherwise? We do know the thread title was in quotes and apparently posted by Boxingscene itself.

If Hunter stated that to boxingscene they would stand behind it.

Email Reeno and he will tell you it was bull**** and they never should have posted it.

Comments like that don't get made and only end up in one single solitary spot on the internet.

[Hitman932]

Bull**** like that would never get posted in the first place if there weren't a bunch of suckers on this site dumb enough to fall for it.

Anyone who believes Hunter said that about Froch's kids is a ****** and I will give you 100 million bscene points if you can find a source to substantiate it.

[Weebler I]

If Hunter stated that to boxingscene they would stand behind it.

Email Reeno and he will tell you it was bull**** and they never should have posted it.

Comments like that don't get made and only end up in one single solitary spot on the internet.

It seems like a very unusual quote to pull out of thin air. The article started "Hunter told boxingscene.com", but w/e.

[KickAzz]

Ward owes the fans apologies for boring fights.

Hunter owes Khan an apology for being a worse trainer than Roach

[Hitman932]

It seems like a very unusual quote to pull out of thin air. The article started "Hunter told boxingscene.com", but w/e.

On the face it is completely bogus. A thread actually gets deleted here about once a month, maybe less. Inflammatory threads are usually just locked.

If Hunter said it then it would be on every boxing site on the web. The fact that most other sites probably saw/heard about it and didn't run it themselves pretty much speaks for itself.

As you said he made some very offensive Uncle Tom remarks in the past. None of which were ever taken down after being posted nor were they censored by boxingscene in any way.

Choosing to assume this story is true and proliferate it (which you are doing with nothing to link it to) instead of assuming it is false when all evidence clearly points to the latter is just proof of an underlying bias/agenda.