Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Canelo: Saul Says Both Sides Budged on Weight

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

Many fans have centered their attention on the contracted weight for the junior middleweight clash between Floyd Mayweather Jr. (42-0, 26KOs) and WBC/WBA/Ring champion Saul "Canelo" Alvarez (44-0-1, 30KOs), taking place on September 14th and live on Showtime Pay-Per-View from the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. The two boxers will battle at 152-pounds, two pounds below the junior middleweight limit of 154.

[Click Here To Read More]

[ddangerous]

Win records are backwards... Floyd has 44...

[Ray*]

Well I don't know then...

[THE REED]

Can't wait to see the vids when the media questions him on previous quotes he's made about catch-weights.

[Doctor_Tenma]

"There was some concerns from Mayweather's camp members, as Canelo rehydrates to 170"

Those were legit concerns, I'm glad we got the fight though.

[Kagami Taiga]

Can't wait to see the vids when the media questions him on previous quotes he's made about catch-weights.

lol, chances are no1 of note will

[Fetta]

This is the fight we all wanted and if canelo is ok then I'm ok. Can't wait for this one.

[Biolink]

Can't wait to see the vids when the media questions him on previous quotes he's made about catch-weights.

Yeah he'll receive some flack for backtracking on stuff he's said in the past but its nothing to be embarrassed about at all. Canelo coming in as a MW+ is a legitimate concern no matter how much Mayweather and his fans believe he is invincible and no matter how badly Mayweather's detractors want to see him lose.

[bojangles1987]

Can't wait to see the vids when the media questions him on previous quotes he's made about catch-weights.

Meh, he'll stutter his way through it like he does everything else and go off on a rant about something entirely unrelated. We've seen this before.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Canelo "To make the fight I had to give a little (On weight) and he had to give a little too"

Acknowledging that Mayweather'c concerns were legit. Who could argue against that?