I think that Naseem Hamed stops Broner

[UTEP]

And that's why your opinion is worthless, your analysis is completely nonsensical, and any garbage that comes out of your mouth is never to be taken seriously. To top it off you are so idiotic that you called my Khan/Judah/Lucas comparison a triangle theory, yet your Hamed/Ponce/Broner argument was not. What a dumb mother****er.

And that's your opinion, you see how that works now fan boy? I don't get butthurt over people's opinions like you do. My opinion is that Naz would beat Broner anyday of the week prime or not. You obviously disagree, and I have no problem with that cuz that's your opinion.

[FaustoGeraci]

Let me try to explain what the other guy is saying.

A triangle theory only works if the guys have a common opponent. Judah fought both Kahn and Lucas. He lost to Kahn but beat Lucas. So based on that, if you say Kahn would beat Lucas because of his lost to Judah, it's a triangle theory.

Since Naseem fought neiter Broner or De Leon, it can't be considered an triangle theory. He's basically saying Naseem was a surperior fight ( whic he was in his prime) to De Leon who Broner struggled with.

I know what the **** a triangle theory is. Forget the Khan-Judah fight. I am saying Khan is a better fighter than Judah (which he is), forget that they fought, so he obviously beats Matthysse based on that moron's logic. Forget it I'm done the guy is an idiot.

[FaustoGeraci]

And that's your opinion, you see how that works now fan boy? I don't get butthurt over people's opinions like you do. My opinion is that Naz would beat Broner anyday of the week prime or not. You obviously disagree, and I have no problem with that cuz that's your opinion.

You are entitled to your own opinions but you are not entitled to your own facts. You can also have the opinion that Lucas beats a prime Mike Tyson, it still makes you a dumb piece of ****. To think an overrated 126 lbs fighter that Barrera dominated beats Broner is asinine. This is the last time we ever talk, because you don't know **** about boxing.

[The Comic DON]

I know what the **** a triangle theory is. Forget the Khan-Judah fight. I am saying Khan is a better fighter than Judah (which he is), forget that they fought, so he obviously beats Matthysse based on that moron's logic. Forget it I'm done the guy is an idiot.

Well in that case you have a real solid case. I believe styles make fights, but you can't ignore the massive weight difference between the two.

However in the mystical land were everyone is the same size, who do you think would win?

[UTEP]

You are entitled to your own opinions but you are not entitled to your own facts. You can also have the opinion that Lucas beats a prime Mike Tyson, it still makes you a dumb piece of ****. To think an overrated 126 lbs fighter that Barrera dominated beats Broner is asinine. This is the last time we ever talk, because you don't know **** about boxing.

Lucas beats a prime Tyson now you're just talking out your ass.

So I guess everybody that believes Naz would beat Broner is asinine and don't know anything about boxing in your eyes huh?

You know i'm not the only one that believes Nas would have beat Broner right?

[heavyhands702]

Lots of drunken posting going on in here. lol First off why would you put a prime prince naseem vs a very green broner?. prince naseem was only good cause his punches came from weird angles and he used alot of antics in the ring other than that he was a ordinary fighter with power. Broner has more hand speed and power than naseem had ever seen in his short lustrious career. Broner has his weakness and it's his defensive skills and they are really bad, but nothing that one of mayweather brothers couldn't fix speaking of roger or floyd senior. look at the barrera fight prince naseem got the snot beat out of him. he was humiliated. There's a reason he disappeard from boxing after that fight. lol

[TU PADRE]

Hamed was 122-126lbs. VALERO wouldve put broner to sleep in 4 rds

[boliodogs]

I think Broner would KO Hamed. Broner is a big lightweight so he has a size and weight advantage. Broner is fast and accurate with his very hard punches. Hamed was a very hard puncher but Broner is the bigger man and seems to take a punch well. Hamed could be careless with his leaping in attacks. I think it's more likely Broner catches Hamed with KO punches than the other way around.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

Lots of people seem to think that Broner would beat Hamed but I just don't se it. Hamed has better movement, the better jab, he is just as fast and has way better power. Neither has the GREAT defense, but Broner's defense may be better. I think Nas will touch Adrien and close the show inside of 5. Broner likes to stalk his opponents, you die off you do that against Naz.

Wasn't Hammed a featherweight? How old was Broner when he was in that division? Around the time he fought De Leon? Still very young? Doesn't sound like a fair matchup to me.

[PrinceNaz88]

Haven't read the thread but Hamed never fought over 126 and Broner started at Super Feather.

Broner at his lightest is very green and Hamed at 126 was his prime weight. Not really a good comparison.