I think that Naseem Hamed stops Broner
Collapse
-
Are you seriously this ****** or are you drunk? Who is backtracking? I quoted every one of your posts.
YOU SAID "Hamed is better than Ponce, so I feel he beats Broner"
I SAID "Khan is better than Judah, so I feel he beats Matthysse" (pure sarcasm pointing out how ****** your initial analysis was)
What is the difference there? Please point it out. Get some help man. And get some sleep.Comment
-
That was one of the worst forum losses I have ever seen someone take on boxingscene. It deserves its own thread so the posters can laugh.Comment
-
Hahaha THIS GUY!!
Once again...YOU SAID Hamed is clearly better than Ponce, so you feel he beats Broner.
I SAID Khan is clearly better than Judah, so I feel he beats Lucas.
THOSE ARE THE EXACT SAME. How is mine a triangle theory but yours is not? You are by far the biggest idiot I have ever seen on here. And your attempt to deflect the conversation into juvenile insults about band camp cds is slightly disturbing, are you a Band Camp fan?
"Do not argue with a fool, for the person watching cannot differentiate between the two"
I'm done.Comment
-
Hahaha THIS GUY!!
Once again...YOU SAID Hamed is clearly better than Ponce, so you feel he beats Broner.
I SAID Khan is clearly better than Judah, so I feel he beats Lucas.
THOSE ARE THE EXACT SAME. How is mine a triangle theory but yours is not? You are by far the biggest idiot I have ever seen on here. And your attempt to deflect the conversation into juvenile insults about band camp cds is slightly disturbing, are you a Band Camp fan?
"Do not argue with a fool, for the person watching cannot differentiate between the two"
I'm done.
You were dropped on your head as a child weren't you?
Where's the triangle theory in "Hamed was an all around better fighter than Ponce is or ever will be so that's why I feel he would have beat Broner"?Comment
-
Because BRONER HAS NOT EVEN HIT HIS PRIME. WHAT THE **** DOES PONCE HAVE TO DO WITH PRINCE HAMED? THEIR STYLES ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING SIMILAR. SO THE BRONER THAT GETS JUDGED IN FANTASY FIGHTS IS THE VERSION THAT FOUGHT PONCE? SO THAT MEANS THE LUCAS THAT GETS JUDGED IS THE ONE THAT LOST TO ZAB. YOU ****** ****.
AND THEN HOW IS ME SAYING KHAN IS BETTER THAN ZAB EVER WAS SO HE BEATS LUCAS ANY DIFFERENT? YOU ARE A MOTHER ****IN FOOL. AS DUMB AS THEY COME. STOP POSTING AND GO READ A BOOK YOU DUMB PIECE OF ****Comment
-
Because BRONER HAS NOT EVEN HIT HIS PRIME. WHAT THE **** DOES PONCE HAVE TO DO WITH PRINCE HAMED? THEIR STYLES ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING SIMILAR. SO THE BRONER THAT GETS JUDGED IN FANTASY FIGHTS IS THE VERSION THAT FOUGHT PONCE? SO THAT MEANS THE LUCAS THAT GETS JUDGED IS THE ONE THAT LOST TO ZAB. YOU ****** ****.
AND THEN HOW IS ME SAYING KHAN IS BETTER THAN ZAB EVER WAS SO HE BEATS LUCAS ANY DIFFERENT? YOU ARE A MOTHER ****IN FOOL. AS DUMB AS THEY COME. STOP POSTING AND GO READ A BOOK YOU DUMB PIECE OF ****
and this is why you are a Broner fan boy. You got butthurt cuz I believe Naz would beat Broner, that's my opinion, you should try not getting your feelings hurt over someone else's opinion. I don't give a shyt if Broner was in his prime or not at 130. My opinion will always be that Naz beats him, prime or not.Comment
-
And that's why your opinion is worthless, your analysis is completely nonsensical, and any garbage that comes out of your mouth is never to be taken seriously. To top it off you are so idiotic that you called my Khan/Judah/Lucas comparison a triangle theory, yet your Hamed/Ponce/Broner argument was not. What a dumb mother****er.and this is why you are a Broner fan boy. You got butthurt cuz I believe Naz would beat Broner, that's my opinion, you should try not getting your feelings hurt over someone else's opinion. I don't give a shyt if Broner was in his prime or not at 130. My opinion will always be that Naz beats him, prime or not.Comment
-
Let me try to explain what the other guy is saying.And that's why your opinion is worthless, your analysis is completely nonsensical, and any garbage that comes out of your mouth is never to be taken seriously. To top it off you are so idiotic that you called my Khan/Judah/Lucas comparison a triangle theory, yet your Hamed/Ponce/Broner argument was not. What a dumb mother****er.
A triangle theory only works if the guys have a common opponent. Judah fought both Kahn and Lucas. He lost to Kahn but beat Lucas. So based on that, if you say Kahn would beat Lucas because of his lost to Judah, it's a triangle theory.
Since Naseem fought neiter Broner or De Leon, it can't be considered an triangle theory. He's basically saying Naseem was a surperior fight ( whic he was in his prime) to De Leon who Broner struggled with.Comment
Comment