tim bradley deserves mayweather fight

[T18Z]

Found it, Lampley got absolutely destroyed, I'm glad we had good judges too.

Oh god, shut the hell up you moron. Duane ford is a idiot, he said in the first minute of the video Pacquaio clearly won the first 6 rounds, yet when you check his scoring he has pacquaio winning 4/6 of the first 6 rounds... the guy is ******, claims bradley gave him a 'boxing lesson' and he basically says because Pacquaio couldn't KO bradley he was downmarking him.

So fail, how can he come up with a 113 - 115 Bradley, he can't even calculate 6 + 6 = 12

I bet he's also forgetting 5 other official renowned judges all scored the fight for Pacquaio, the guy just doesn't wanna admit he ****ed up, and neither do you, stop grasping for straws it's pathetic.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Oh god, shut the hell up you moron. Duane ford is a idiot, he said in the first minute of the video Pacquaio clearly won the first 6 rounds, yet when you check his scoring he has pacquaio winning 4/6 of the first 6 rounds... the guy is ******, claims bradley gave him a 'boxing lesson' and he basically says because Pacquaio couldn't KO bradley he was downmarking him.

So fail, how can he come up with a 113 - 115 Bradley, he can't even calculate 6 + 6 = 12

I bet he's also forgetting 5 other official renowned judges all scored the fight for Pacquaio, the guy just doesn't wanna admit he ****ed up, and neither do you.

Ford said "The first 6 rounds, clearly Pacquiao was the winner". I see your comprehension sucks. I agree with him too, I had it 4-2 Pacquiao.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Oh god, shut the hell up you moron. Duane ford is a idiot, he said in the first minute of the video Pacquaio clearly won the first 6 rounds, yet when you check his scoring he has pacquaio winning 4/6 of the first 6 rounds... the guy is ******, claims bradley gave him a 'boxing lesson' and he basically says because Pacquaio couldn't KO bradley he was downmarking him.

So fail, how can he come up with a 113 - 115 Bradley, he can't even calculate 6 + 6 = 12

I bet he's also forgetting 5 other official renowned judges all scored the fight for Pacquaio, the guy just doesn't wanna admit he ****ed up, and neither do you, stop grasping for straws it's pathetic.

You don't have good comprehensive skills..

[T18Z]

Ford said "The first 6 rounds, clearly Pacquiao was the winner". I see your comprehension sucks. I agree with him too, I had it 4-2 Pacquiao.

Among the experts above, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley.

After the decision the WBO ordered a video review of the bout. The five judges on the WBO's committee all scored the fight in Pacquiao's favor — 117-111, 117-111, 118-110, 116-112 and 115-113. However, the WBO can't overturn the result of the fight.

I'm sorry, what are you arguing about? I'm saying Pacquaio won the fight by a large margin, with compubox, world class judges and 99.5% of the world agreeing with me, are you telling me Bradley won? Or are you just complaining about compubox but still admitting Pacquaio won?

I'd take the above sentences I posted in bold into account before you choose your answer.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Among the experts above, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley.

After the decision the WBO ordered a video review of the bout. The five judges on the WBO's committee all scored the fight in Pacquiao's favor — 117-111, 117-111, 118-110, 116-112 and 115-113. However, the WBO can't overturn the result of the fight.

I'm sorry, what are you arguing about? I'm saying Pacquaio won the fight, are you telling me Bradley won? Or are you just complaining about compubox but still admitting Pacquaio won?

I'd take the above sentences I posted in bold into account before you choose your answer.

I've watched it countless, again, countless. My initial argument was to demonstrate that CompuBox is extremely inaccurate. You on the other hand would rather be in bed with that system of scoring to suit your argument, I don't care whether you had Pacquiao winning or not, I'm perfectly fine with that as the fight could have gone either way.

[adamdoyle]

Among the experts above, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley.

After the decision the WBO ordered a video review of the bout. The five judges on the WBO's committee all scored the fight in Pacquiao's favor — 117-111, 117-111, 118-110, 116-112 and 115-113. However, the WBO can't overturn the result of the fight.

I'm sorry, what are you arguing about? I'm saying Pacquaio won the fight, are you telling me Bradley won? Or are you just complaining about compubox but still admitting Pacquaio won?

I'd take the above sentences I posted in bold into account before you choose your answer.

Compubox?? really??? If you think Pac won you simply can't see what's going on in the ring. Bradley caught 80% of Pac left hands on the gloves. learn to not listen to the crowd.

[T18Z]

I've watched it countless, again, countless. My initial argument was to demonstrate that CompuBox is extremely inaccurate. You on the other hand would rather be in bed with that system of scoring to suit your argument, I don't care whether you had Pacquiao winning or not, I'm perfectly fine with that as the fight could have gone either way.

CompuxBox can have errors, but so can close to every system which has human beings involved, it does not mean you can simply just state *CompuBox suxxx it doesn't count, because it does count, and a lot of the time is accurate, unless you of course can come up with a better system?

I'm not in bed with CompuBox, I'm in bed with using common sense, which is something you obviously lack. You are 0.5% of scorers in the world who actually believe Bradley could have won, you insist that CompuBox is inaccurate.. which is such an exaggeration.. it has errors, which affect both fighters, but what system doesn't? Despite the errors you just can't seem to admit what's obvious, Pacquaio outlanded Bradley greatly, you dont need compubox to see that.

[Doctor_Tenma]

CompuxBox can have errors, but so can close to every system which has human beings involved, it does not mean you can simply just state *CompuBox suxxx it doesn't count, because it does count, and a lot of the time is accurate, unless you of course can come up with a better system?

I'm not in bed with CompuBox, I'm in bed with using common sense, which is something you obviously lack. You are 0.5% of scorers in the world who actually believe Bradley could have won, you insist that CompuBox is innacurate.. which is such an exxageration.. it has errors, which affect both fighters, but what system doesn't? Despite the errors you just can't seem to admit what's obvious, Pacquaio outlanded Bradley greatly, you dont need compubox to see that.

That's real, it sucks. Think DLH-Pernell Whitaker, check this out...

[T18Z]

Compubox?? really??? If you think Pac won you simply can't see what's going on in the ring. Bradley caught 80% of Pac left hands on the gloves. learn to not listen to the crowd.

Yeah, because the whole fight consisted of left handed shots, fail.

[adamdoyle]

Yeah, because the whole fight consisted of left handed shots, fail.

Haha this shows how dumb you are, I was pointing out a big part of the fight, which was Bradley's ability to catch the left hands, don't worry i know you and the pathetic fanboys were cheering for right hands that didn't land either. I dare you to have the COURAGE to watch any of the analysis on youtube that replays the exchanges in slow mo, I ****ing dare you. I watched this fight live on a stream that was ****ed(blurry,jumpy), from what me a my brother could see we taught pacquaio won easy and were like WTF. THEN we watched the HD replay and seen the fight for what it was. It was like watching Devon Alexander he was landing nothing yet the crowd wouldn't shut up. Pacquiao lost...so what it happened before and will happen again. Wanna talk about robberies let talk Pac-Marquez 1-3