tim bradley deserves mayweather fight

[Dr Rumack]

People really need to be brutally shot down every time they try to use the Compubox 'connect percentage' to support an arguments.

It's a useless measure of what's happening, because a lot of the time it is impossible for the human eye to tell whether shots are landing or not as the person watches the action in real time. Pick out a fight yourself and try to do it. Even when you slow it down and re-watch an exchange, it's still not easy to tell if shots are landing or not for sure. And we're supposed to believe that they can accurately measure this stuff in real time?

That's an insult to our intelligence, or at least it should be. People don't always see when they're being insulted.

[T18Z]

Haha this shows how dumb you are, I was pointing out a big part of the fight, which was Bradley's ability to catch the left hands, don't worry i know you and the pathetic fanboys were cheering for right hands that didn't land either. I dare you to have the COURAGE to watch any of the analysis on youtube that replays the exchanges in slow mo, I ****ing dare you. I watched this fight live on a stream that was ****ed(blurry,jumpy), from what me a my brother could see we taught pacquaio won easy and were like WTF. THEN we watched the HD replay and seen the fight for what it was. It was like watching Devon Alexander he was landing nothing yet the crowd wouldn't shut up. Pacquiao lost...so what it happened before and will happen again. Wanna talk about robberies let talk Pac-Marquez 1-3

Watched the HD replay? Lemme guess... I should watch it without sound too? Why are you so angry, when it's obvious you are wrong.. 121 scored for pacquaio and you can bet watched it in HD, only 1 scored Bradley... clearly I'm wrong and you're right... lol...

The 5 official judges are also wrong too, but you are right, yeah cool story bro..

[T18Z]

People really need to be brutally shot down every time they try to use the Compubox 'connect percentage' to support an arguments.

It's a useless measure of what's happening, because a lot of the time it is impossible for the human eye to tell whether shots are landing or not as the person watches the action in real time. Pick out a fight yourself and try to do it. Even when you slow it down and re-watch an exchange, it's still not easy to tell if shots are landing or not for sure. And we're supposed to believe that they can accurately measure this stuff in real time?

That's an insult to our intelligence, or at least it should be. People don't always see when they're being insulted.

Yeah, because Compubox often has such a huge margin of error that it counts hundreds of punches that missed as hit... /sarcasm off.

You got a better system that we can use maybe? I'd rather trust CompuBox than a bias opinion. What you think I'm gonna trust... Compubox, an overwhelming huge view that Pacquaio won, world champions agreeing, official judges agreeing, sport commentators agreeing, boxing forums agreeing, the world ****ing agreeing (besides you 2 lolz) or.... the 0.01% rest who think Bradley won?

Common sense and deductive reasoning, it's pretty obvious to see who won, every single damn sign points to it, but you choose to ignore it. You can't reason with people like you.

[Dr Rumack]

Yeah, because Compubox often has such a huge margin of error that it counts hundreds of punches that missed as hit... /sarcasm off.

You got a better system that we can use maybe? I'd rather trust CompuBox than a bias opinion.

That's a pretty bizarre worldview man.

'This system is stone useless but I can't think of a better one so I'm going to place my trust in it anyway.'

That's like living your life by a broken clock.

[T18Z]

That's a pretty bizarre worldview man.

'This system is stone useless but I can't think of a better one so I'm going to place my trust in it anyway.'

That's like living your life by a broken clock.

I didn't say CompuBox was useless, I said it has errors, but can you name me a system which doesn't?

[BUNGALOWS]

Yeah, because Compubox often has such a huge margin of error that it counts hundreds of punches that missed as hit... /sarcasm off.

You got a better system that we can use maybe? I'd rather trust CompuBox than a bias opinion. What you think I'm gonna trust... Compubox, an overwhelming huge view that Pacquaio won, world champions agreeing, official judges agreeing, sport commentators agreeing, boxing forums agreeing, the world ****ing agreeing (besides you 2 lolz) or.... the 0.01% rest who think Bradley won?

Common sense and deductive reasoning, it's pretty obvious to see who won, every single damn sign points to it, but you choose to ignore it. You can't reason with people like you.

Watch Cotto/Floyd, or Ortiz/Floyd and you'll realize how ****ty compubox is.

It's downright biased, and disgusting.

[Dr Rumack]

And yes, there is a better system. You take a round in which you and whoever you're arguing with disagree about and you go through it blow by blow, exchange by exchange. That's how you establish the truth of what happened in a fight, not vague conclusions about the pattern of the fight overall.

[adamdoyle]

Watched the HD replay? Lemme guess... I should watch it without sound too? Why are you so angry, when it's obvious you are wrong.. 121 scored for pacquaio and you can bet watched it in HD, only 1 scored Bradley... clearly I'm wrong and you're right... lol...

The 5 official judges are also wrong too, but you are right, yeah cool story bro..

It doesn't matter during the slowed replays the sound is distorted if your were smart you'd know that. So you think your right coz your the majority? That almost proves your wrong! You keep going on about 5 official judges scored it for Pac, BUT fail to comprehend that the only reason they held the screening was because people taught Pac won so from the start they had biased opinions it'd be impossible not to. And what about the 3 official judges who scored the fight the first time. They happen to be the ONLY official judges capable of being wrong. You are ******, it's quite clear that you are from the breed of *******s who think there smart yet there always the dumbest in a group.

[T18Z]

And yes, there is a better system. You take a round in which you and whoever you're arguing with disagree about and you go through it blow by blow, exchange by exchange. That's how you establish the truth of what happened in a fight, not vague conclusions about the pattern of the fight overall.

Yeah, because that's going to be possible mid fight... what? That's unrealistic, and I'm guessing you know that.

[Johnny Cage]

No way. NO way TR let's Bradley go in there and get his 0 taken from Mayweather. He deserves it but I have a better chance at getting the fight. Seriously.