Comments Thread For: Guillermo Jones Refused To Take a Post-Fight Drug Test

[Kannabis Kid]

More like marquez koing pac cold with one shot

Your talking about Marquez who has 40 KO's out of 55 wins? That Marquez the same one who KOed the Pacquiao that had been KOed 2 times before at 112 and below? The same one that Pacquiao could never KO or for that matter anyone, and the same one who had Pacquiao hurt in previous fights? You must be crazy but it figures when you have a hand wrap cheat like Tito El Pito Trinidad in your avatar. Marquez never been caught cheating, Tito got caught red handed literally and his career was over after that where did his power go? Lol its funny people still crying over **** that hasnt been proven yet they blatantly turn a blind eye and support proven cheaters. What a shame

[LA_2_Vegas]

Never knew about the diuretic past, and this here is pretty fishy so can't really comment on that part right now. But Jones already had a pretty crazy chin and I posted before teh fight that he is one of the biggest wastes of ability of past years and has always been a natural talent and I'm not surprised by this upset, no slight to Denis. And far as him being bigger, he started at welter

[yoz]

LOL, they couldn't beat him in the ring, so the Russian Mafia are resorting to other means.

He'll 'fail' some other drug test now and be stripped.

[M Bison]

Refusing...

That's just as good as testing positive for something that you're not allowed to use, I don't get it really.
Jones never looked anything special to me to say he must be on some kind of performance enhancing drugs, he just got a luck shot in that ****ed Dennis Lebedevs eye up this is what won him this fight!
Without that swelling over his left eye I believe?
Jones would of probably just been battered for a 12 round UD loss.

[M Bison]

He tested positive for a diuretic not a PED and he was tested so mamate pito

As I have been told...

Diuretics can be used for more than just weight loss!
They can be used to hinder the detection of any other substances in the body which have been used, just like J'leon has used them we can't be fully sure what else he used.

Its a banned drug for a reason lets leave it at that, rules and regulations are there for a reason.

[Ray*]

Jones is doping

Why else wouldnt u take a drug test thats in the contract? This is all Kings doing

Is testing in his contract?

[Ray*]

Who asked for the test? If the test was requested only because he won i can understand him being pissed and refusing.

Well this is why I want to know if he was contracted to do so, if he wasn't then asking him to do so after the fight is shady.

[Ray*]

Drug testing in boxing is so lenient. If a guy refuses, you strip him of a win, his belt and withhold his entire purse, immediately

But no, they're gonna go into a circle jerk all blaming each other and nothing at all will be done and it will be swept under the rug. Anybody refusing testing should be treated exactly the same as someone testing positive.

Wow funny you said this, welcome to the right side of boxing. Just like I welcome those fans who somehow backed Pacquiaos not testing stance but once he got KO they all became the leaders on drug crusade and wants testing and strict penalties, now that lebedev got KO it seems to have humbled you...anyways welcome.

[M Bison]

Is testing in his contract?

If testing is not in the stipulation of a contract does that condone the use of illegal substances?

I think you're missing the big picture right here.

Cheating should never make someone prosper, I don't know clearly you must be for cheating to be allowed with a remark like that.

If the opponent is not on anything then what's the big fuss?

He's tested positive before and by the looks of it he's used something yet again.

[Ray*]

If testing is not in the stipulation of a contract does that condone the use of illegal substances?

I think you're missing the big picture right here.

Cheating should never make someone prosper, I don't know clearly you must be for cheating to be allowed with a remark like that.

If the opponent is not on anything then what's the big fuss?

He's tested positive before and by the looks of it he's used something yet again.

Who said anything to that effect? I asked a simple question not a lecture mate.