Comments Thread For: Team Pacquaio: Marquez and Bradley Missed Their Shot

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HeroBando
    I love Mayweather
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 17452
    • 236
    • 0
    • 24,430

    #61
    Originally posted by damned1974
    Manny should have taken that $40,000,000 offer from Floyd.....and here we are saying JMM and Bradley should have taken a Pac payday...Pac lost out on a lot more cash than these guys.
    No he didn't. He's under contract with TR, hence the 40m offer was for him to split with TR. They split at least that much for JMM 3 and 4, so that's a **** deal for the biggest fight in history

    Comment

    • HeroBando
      I love Mayweather
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2011
      • 17452
      • 236
      • 0
      • 24,430

      #62
      Originally posted by VERSION1 (V1)
      not matter what we think the judges gave it to bradley so rome is right
      Have you ever made this point about Rios Abril? He also won on the cards, but you never see posters making that point about this fight, or about PWill Lara or any other universally acknowledged robbery

      Comment

      • peplz
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 2444
        • 256
        • 36
        • 17,128

        #63
        Losses and catch weights

        Once again Pacquiao facing a fighter coming off of a loss

        Comment

        • HeroBando
          I love Mayweather
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2011
          • 17452
          • 236
          • 0
          • 24,430

          #64
          Originally posted by peplz
          Once again Pacquiao facing a fighter coming off of a loss
          what was the other time? you notice Pac is coming off a loss, a lot worse one than his opponent?

          Comment

          • Espada
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 1073
            • 75
            • 53
            • 7,638

            #65
            Originally posted by peplz
            Once again Pacquiao facing a fighter coming off of a loss
            another Floydiot mentality

            Comment

            • daddymon
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 66
              • 0
              • 0
              • 6,110

              #66
              Wow

              Originally posted by Espada
              Rios' paycheck will be bigger than these two monkeys (Bradley and Marquez) Marquez has the right to refuse a rematch because of the KTFO win but for Bradley, who the **** he thinks he is?
              Pac & Jmm fight did not happen because Jmm asked for 50/50. But BOB & PAC wanted the same deal to fight floyd.

              Comment

              • umop-ap!sdn
                370HSSV
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2013
                • 21499
                • 269
                • 358
                • 33,085

                #67
                Bradley didn't beat pac, log off and get a clue.
                Originally posted by T18Z
                15000 posts and you are still this clueless? I'd love to see you argue your opinion vs the HUGE majority that scored it for Pacquaio.

                Protip: 95% know Bradley lost, including himself.

                I CHALLENGE EVERYONE WHO THINKS PACMAN GOT "ROBBED" TO WATCH A YOUTUBE VIDEO TITLED "Manny Pacquiao receives biased commentating, again! (Bradley vs Pacquiao". I CHALLENGE YOU TO WATCH THAT VIDEO, THAN WATCH THE FIGHT AGAIN WITH NO SOUND. GET A PEN AND PAPER, OR OPEN WORD ON YOUR COMPUTER, AND SCORE, ROUND FOR ROUND THE FIGHT. GURANTEE YOU THAT IF YOU ARE A TRUE STUDENT OF THE SPORT, OR EVEN JUST A FAN, YOU CANNOT DISAGREE THAT THE COMMENTARY OF THE LIVE EVENT IS 100% OF THE REASON THAT PEOPLE THOUGHT PACQUIAO GOT ROBBED.

                ILL EVEN DO YOU BETTER, HERE'S THE VID.

                "/watch?v=YUw-FoGDWU8"

                IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO TO COMPLETE THAT LINK THAN YOU ARE A NUMBSKULL

                Comment

                • daddymon
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 66
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 6,110

                  #68
                  Originally posted by HeroBando
                  No he didn't. He's under contract with TR, hence the 40m offer was for him to split with TR. They split at least that much for JMM 3 and 4, so that's a **** deal for the biggest fight in history
                  My thing is this, I like Pac, do I think he could beat Floyd ? No. Would have been a good fight ? yes, but Bob personal filling for Floyd got in the way of the fight. If Pac was with someone else, it would have happen. So when people say Floyd is some how afraid of Pac, FOR REAL? And what was bradley suppose to do wait on Pac to fight Jmm two time, yes right. And do not forget Jmm wanted 50/50 to fight Pac. That make Bob turn down that fight.

                  Comment

                  • AntonTheMeh
                    STOP CRYIN
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 21222
                    • 700
                    • 709
                    • 31,623

                    #69
                    JMM didn't.

                    Comment

                    • T18Z
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 2073
                      • 101
                      • 66
                      • 10,410

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Trudoe
                      I CHALLENGE EVERYONE WHO THINKS PACMAN GOT "ROBBED" TO WATCH A YOUTUBE VIDEO TITLED "Manny Pacquiao receives biased commentating, again! (Bradley vs Pacquiao". I CHALLENGE YOU TO WATCH THAT VIDEO, THAN WATCH THE FIGHT AGAIN WITH NO SOUND. GET A PEN AND PAPER, OR OPEN WORD ON YOUR COMPUTER, AND SCORE, ROUND FOR ROUND THE FIGHT. GURANTEE YOU THAT IF YOU ARE A TRUE STUDENT OF THE SPORT, OR EVEN JUST A FAN, YOU CANNOT DISAGREE THAT THE COMMENTARY OF THE LIVE EVENT IS 100% OF THE REASON THAT PEOPLE THOUGHT PACQUIAO GOT ROBBED.

                      ILL EVEN DO YOU BETTER, HERE'S THE VID.

                      "/watch?v=YUw-FoGDWU8"

                      IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO TO COMPLETE THAT LINK THAN YOU ARE A NUMBSKULL
                      You're a ****** moron that can't even notice when a video has been edited? The shots he claims *missed* clearly hit and when you see the same punch from a different angle it's obvious.

                      Is this the best you've got? Claiming people aren't true fans of the sport if they don't agree with you spewing a load of **** everywhere? Get the f-k outta here you waste of space.

                      Max Kellerman even reviewed the whole fight play by play, round by round and said there were only 4 possible rounds Bradley could have won, some of those rounds could have went to Pacquaio also.

                      Everyone with a brain knows Bradley got outclassed and lost, heck 5 OFFICIAL judges reviewed the fight and all 5 had landslide victories for Pacquaio.

                      nearly half of these slow motion breakdowns are correct. however just about half of the other slow motions are incorrect and actually biased in favor of bradley. u cant really see some of the hits in slo mo but definitely hear them. ex 3:52 is a hit not a duck or the break down at 5:13 is completely incorrect. i can go on but im not going to obsess over this. good job picking portions of the fight to make it look as though bradley won this fight




                      I bet you think these punches missed too?

                      Last edited by T18Z; 05-07-2013, 03:08 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP