Comments Thread For: Koncz: Pacquiao is The Only One To Test Mayweather

[HeroBando]

Ask yourself this... If the MAJORITY of the people didn't have Marquez winning the first 3 fights would there have been a fourth fight?? Marquez won in the eye's of the people, pac felt he lost and wanted to convince himself and his people that he could beat Marquez with out ANY controversy but did he? And when Marquez won he left ZERO I repeat ZERO doubt over the outcome... so what could you say about that?? OH AIGHT

I don't think there was a majority either way, was close to 50/50, maybe slight to Pac in 1 and a bit wider to JMM in 3. But even here press row was like 52/48 or something.

[techliam]

I don't think there was a majority either way, was close to 50/50, maybe slight to Pac in 1 and a bit wider to JMM in 3. But even here press row was like 52/48 or something.

Yes, the first three fights are pick em fights, choosing either fighter as winners of those fights is fine - neither deserved it more than the other.

But it seems that, because it's Pacquiao, Marquez should instantly get it because it was close. Which is ******ed logic, clearly

99% of people on here are more concerned about boxing politics re this fight, more so than the fight itself. That's really all I can say

[BlackSnakeMamba]

If Pacquiao beat Alvarado or Rios. He deserves a title shot againts Floyd Mayweather JR.

I love to see the Post JMM Pacquiao vs. Lucas Matthyse. I hope Team Pacquiao hires a good defensive trainer.

[Reloaded]

If Pacquiao beat Alvarado or Rios. He deserves a title shot againts Floyd Mayweather JR.

I love to see the Post JMM Pacquiao vs. Lucas Matthyse. I hope Team Pacquiao hires a good defensive trainer.

Floyd would beat Rios and Alvarado on the same night lol , Manny is scraping the barrel now , but anybody decent at WW will give him fits so I can see why they want small guys that just stand there .

[pwned]

Ask yourself this... If the MAJORITY of the people didn't have Marquez winning the first 3 fights would there have been a fourth fight?? Marquez won in the eye's of the people, pac felt he lost and wanted to convince himself and his people that he could beat Marquez with out ANY controversy but did he? And when Marquez won he left ZERO I repeat ZERO doubt over the outcome... so what could you say about that?? OH AIGHT

I would say something like this : )

Only in a pacquiao haters head is it worth celebrating when it takes someone 4 tries to finally pass the Pacquiao test. Very rarely does a fighter give an oppenent 4 opportunities to figure them out. Its like you seeing the same test 4 times and only being smart enough once to figure it out. I would hope after that many attempts you at least win once. Only in a pacquiao haters head does this not make sense. In every other real world situation if it takes someone 4 tries to pass any test, lets say a DMV test, its considered a failure not an accomplishment. Typical Pacquiao hater, logic bounces right off of them

[HeroBando]

Floyd would beat Rios and Alvarado on the same night lol , Manny is scraping the barrel now , but anybody decent at WW will give him fits so I can see why they want small guys that just stand there .

Yeah, but Guerrero would have all kinds of issues vs either Mike or Rios. He thought 151lb, 64' reach Aydin punched very hard, lol

[Furn]

So its the same old, it would be an easy win for Floyd so no point doing the fight line ?

You could see from yesterday's fight that a southpaw with more speed, power and accuracy that throws more would give Floyd trouble. He just doesn't like getting hit and unlike Jmm he won't stay in the pocket and exchange.

It's still a 50-50 fight IMO.

[pwned]

Ask yourself this... If the MAJORITY of the people didn't have Marquez winning the first 3 fights would there have been a fourth fight?? Marquez won in the eye's of the people, pac felt he lost and wanted to convince himself and his people that he could beat Marquez with out ANY controversy but did he? And when Marquez won he left ZERO I repeat ZERO doubt over the outcome... so what could you say about that?? OH AIGHT

Majority? HAHA..more like lost in the eyes of only pacquiao haters. Don't confuse being the loudest for being the majority. You set up the misguided scenario where the only reason a 4th fight can take place is if Marquez was winning all of the previous fights. Is not possible for the fight to happen because of money? Because he would be a bigger draw than fighting Bradley for example? I guess it couldn't happen because the 3rd fight was controversial? It can only happen if he marquez won all of the past 3 fights? I guess the alternative scenarios (reality) are ones you desperately want to ignore. My original point stands. I would hope that after 4 tries he can finally win. Good for Marquez, he finally won once.

[BTTAG145]

I would say something like this : )

Only in a pacquiao haters head is it worth celebrating when it takes someone 4 tries to finally pass the Pacquiao test. Very rarely does a fighter give an oppenent 4 opportunities to figure them out. Its like you seeing the same test 4 times and only being smart enough once to figure it out. I would hope after that many attempts you at least win once. Only in a pacquiao haters head does this not make sense. In every other real world situation if it takes someone 4 tries to pass any test, lets say a DMV test, its considered a failure not an accomplishment. Typical Pacquiao hater, logic bounces right off of them

But Pacquiao didn't pass the Marquez test all 4 times so............

[Pacquiaotard86]

If pac is an easy fight, why wouldnt floyd pursue the fight harder, he would make a fortune?

He bases his logic and lifestyle on earning a high income, but when the best oppurtunity is right under his nose he doesnt take it.... I dont get it...?