Tweet
Also you say get away with defending against a guy who has never beaten a top 50 fighter. Okay. Now tell me this......
What's worse. Fighting a fresh new face who no one has heard of who could potentially be a decent fighter if he just gets his chance (every fighter needed that first "chance") who is undefeated......... Or voluntarily defending against, a NINE LOSS Carlos Baldomir, a SHOT , 2007 (2007!!!!) 4 loss Oscar De La Hoya who everybody knew were beatable and had no chance? (Yes I'm talking about Floyd) ..... Why not say the same thing about Floyd then or why doesn't OP make a thread for the welterweight division?
Answer that questjon. OH and if you say...but...bbut DLH and Baldomir brought in big money!!!!! Then that goes compltely against the OPs post and is a complete contradiction. You serious right now?
And that's taking into account all of those THings I mentioned in my previous post.
Come on bro, you're being ******. And this thread is absolutely pointless and bias.
What's worse. Fighting a fresh new face who no one has heard of who could potentially be a decent fighter if he just gets his chance (every fighter needed that first "chance") who is undefeated......... Or voluntarily defending against, a NINE LOSS Carlos Baldomir, a SHOT , 2007 (2007!!!!) 4 loss Oscar De La Hoya who everybody knew were beatable and had no chance? (Yes I'm talking about Floyd) ..... Why not say the same thing about Floyd then or why doesn't OP make a thread for the welterweight division?
Answer that questjon. OH and if you say...but...bbut DLH and Baldomir brought in big money!!!!! Then that goes compltely against the OPs post and is a complete contradiction. You serious right now?
And that's taking into account all of those THings I mentioned in my previous post.
Come on bro, you're being ******. And this thread is absolutely pointless and bias.
Comment