The Klitschko fans defending Vitali fighting Charr while at the same time ridiculing Haye for doing the same are pathetic. Vitali fighting him is much worse than Haye, Vitali being a title holder should be expected to fight a higher level of competition. Charr being undefeated counts for little, he was still the same fighter that he is now. As for Haye not being deserving, Charr, Solis, Briggs, Sosnowski, Johnson, Arreola and Gomez all didn't have wins over top 10 fighters and all got a title shot at Vitali. We all know Vitali is ducking him so lets stop the ****** game of Haye "earning" a shot at Vitali.
Comments Thread For: Haye vs. Charr is Set For June 29, Presser on May 1st
Collapse
-
I'm alright with this.
A big, durable HW who fought Vitali for Haye's return....perfectly solid start.Comment
-
The Klitschko fans defending Vitali fighting Charr while at the same time ridiculing Haye for doing the same are pathetic. Vitali fighting him is much worse than Haye, Vitali being a title holder should be expected to fight a higher level of competition. Charr being undefeated counts for little, he was still the same fighter that he is now. As for Haye not being deserving, Charr, Solis, Briggs, Sosnowski, Johnson, Arreola and Gomez all didn't have wins over top 10 fighters and all got a title shot at Vitali. We all know Vitali is ducking him so lets stop the ****** game of Haye "earning" a shot at Vitali.Comment
-
Comment
-
The Klitschko fans defending Vitali fighting Charr while at the same time ridiculing Haye for doing the same are pathetic. Vitali fighting him is much worse than Haye, Vitali being a title holder should be expected to fight a higher level of competition. Charr being undefeated counts for little, he was still the same fighter that he is now. As for Haye not being deserving, Charr, Solis, Briggs, Sosnowski, Johnson, Arreola and Gomez all didn't have wins over top 10 fighters and all got a title shot at Vitali. We all know Vitali is ducking him so lets stop the ****** game of Haye "earning" a shot at Vitali.
FFS, there were plenty of other options. Pulev said he was open to fighting Haye. Tyson Fury has even called him out. Beating either would put him in line for an IBF title shot.
And If Haye was serious about wanting a shot at Vitali, he'd be on the phone to Don King trying to organize a fight with Stiverne.Last edited by yoz; 04-29-2013, 05:10 AM.Comment
-
The Klitschko fans defending Vitali fighting Charr while at the same time ridiculing Haye for doing the same are pathetic. Vitali fighting him is much worse than Haye, Vitali being a title holder should be expected to fight a higher level of competition. Charr being undefeated counts for little, he was still the same fighter that he is now. As for Haye not being deserving, Charr, Solis, Briggs, Sosnowski, Johnson, Arreola and Gomez all didn't have wins over top 10 fighters and all got a title shot at Vitali. We all know Vitali is ducking him so lets stop the ****** game of Haye "earning" a shot at Vitali.
Keep believing in this, fan boy!Comment
-
I don't think its that. The whole point of Haye's return was to earn a mandatory shot with Vitali. What does beating Manuel Charr achieve? It certainly won't improve his ranking.
FFS, there were plenty of other options. Pulev said he was open to fighting Haye. Tyson Fury has even called him out. Beating either would put him in line for an IBF title shot.
And If Haye was serious about wanting a shot at Vitali, he'd be on the phone to Don King trying to organize a fight with Stiverne.
Fury doesn't want to fight Haye, and if he is fighting Pulev it also rules him out.Comment
-
Haye's choice is indefensible. Just as Vitali's was.Comment
-
Yeah now when Fury showed he's vulnerable, Haye wants to fight him. Classic HayeComment
-
Likewise, this can easily be applied to the Haye fans that are justifying this fight on the basis that Vitali fought this bum as well. Charr was sh^t when Vitali fought him and nothing has changed since.Comment
Comment