Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Miguel Cotto is also an Option For Canelo

[Lords]

Wait wait wait! Now the knock on Canelo is that he hasn't completely obliterated a top fighter? You mother***ers are pathetic do you know that? You knock the kid because he hasn't fought anyone. He gets a solid win against another top 154 pounder and now you want to change your excuses? Grow some balls dude and admit you were wrong. Stop coming up with these bullsheet excuses it just makes you look like wounded vagina!

And then you Cotto in your sig who was completely schooled by Trout. Trout schooled Cotto worse then Floyd did so maybe Canelo wasn't as impressive because ugh i don't know Trout is actually very good and most likely would beat everyone else at 154. ***ing dumbass!

IMO i thought Trout did more in the Canelo fight to get the win. Its not about admitting I was wrong because up until the trout fight he had zero solid wins. Yes beating trout was a solid win but I thought Trout did more in the fight.

As far as Cotto goes, Trout had a 6-8 reach advantage, was taller, and is younger then Miguel. This fight was a horible matchup for him. How about giving Cotto props for having the balls to take on this bad matchup and not playing it safe and fighting the easy fights.

Sigs? Fedor is a bum who got exposed for the fraud he is. He got choked by Werdum who got dropped from the UFC for being garbage, he lost to a slow giant silva, and got owned by an old henderson. He made a living fighting cans at pride and couldnt cut it in the states against legit fighters.

[kenwills]

Man I can agree more about Cotto. I have great respect for him but especially at 154 he's collecting a check. Canelo needs to fight GGG, Martinez, or Chavez Jr for me to take him serious. He will not be able to rest % 75 of every round. And they actually have the power to get his attention, something that I knew before the fight Trout didn't have. Angula, Kirkland and Lara I beleive Canelo beats them all. I just don't want to see Ortiz, Maidana, or even Mayweather. The size advantge really would allow us to see how good Canelo really is.

[pistol whip]

IMO i thought Trout did more in the Canelo fight to get the win. Its not about admitting I was wrong because up until the trout fight he had zero solid wins. Yes beating trout was a solid win but I thought Trout did more in the fight.

As far as Cotto goes, Trout had a 6-8 reach advantage, was taller, and is younger then Miguel. This fight was a horible matchup for him. How about giving Cotto props for having the balls to take on this bad matchup and not playing it safe and fighting the easy fights.

Sigs? Fedor is a bum who got exposed for the fraud he is. He got choked by Werdum who got dropped from the UFC for being garbage, he lost to a slow giant silva, and got owned by an old henderson. He made a living fighting cans at pride and couldnt cut it in the states against legit fighters.

First I would like to address your knownothing Fedor comments. When Fedor was prime he was undefeated for 10 years and held the pride championship for 4 years. During those 4 years all the best HW's fought in pride. Please tell me from 2003 when Fedor won the title to 2007 when pride folded who were these great HW's he was ducking? Oh yeah not only do you know nothing about boxing you also don't know anything about MMA.

Second I have always given cotto credit he's a first ballot hall of famer and he fought bravely against trout evenr though he was schooled.


Last you are in a distinct minority of knownothings if you think trout won the fight. ESPN, The Ring, Every other news source that cover boxing where were they? Why arn't the crying robbery??? Oh thats becasue there was no robbery and you were scoring the fight like it was an amature boxing match.

[Alpha & Omega]

Canelo gives Cotto a solid beating and stops him. Cotto still has some fights left in him and can get some W's but he needs to stay far away from Canelo, GGG, Martinez 100%. I could see him beating Ishe Smith possibly though.