Starting to notice Mayweather fans trend:
Collapse
-
Heres a long running Floyd stan trend.
"oh, so and so wants to fight Floyd? He needs to fight this guy and that guy first before he even thinks of getting a chance".Comment
-
Its a ****ty criteria, thats why. When you sit back and really look at it, its not great. I asked the question last night that went ignored.The post I was responding to said that all of Mayweather's opposition has come off of great wins where they looked good and that although Canelo won, he didn't look good doing it.
So if Ortiz winning a fight in which he got dropped in is considered looking better than Canelo winning a fight against a guy that he dropped, a guy that had never been dropped before, then I'm not really sure I can agree with that criteria.
When was the last time Floyd fought a talented fighter in his 20s who came off of a dominating performance? Dominating doesn't mean you get beat up as bad as you beat someone. It doesn't mean you get knocked down multiple times. Dominating means you whooped as from front to back.
Floyd has not faced a fighter like that in a very long time. If Canelo had stopped Trout last night, he pisses the fight away. I'm more than certain he pulled back to make sure he didn't overly dominate Trout. He had that much control of what happened in the ring.Comment
-
They are XenophobesThey seem to take offense to explosive foreign fighters who come here and make money from Americans. It's weird, they all have weird hatred for guys like Matthysse, GGG, Pacquiao etc. They even hate Martinez now that some people say Floyd's ducking him. Their hypocrisy it at it's worst when it comes to the Klitschko's. Somethings definitely odd, maybe they feel threatened?Comment
-
im not sure what this means.did i say floyd has fought opponents that didn't get dropped?what i said was floyds last couple of opponents were coming off big wins that were very impresive for them at the time and you can't say everyone was not making a big deal of ortiz win over berto when it happened maybe now you and others may critcize but at the time ortiz was made out to be a beast for that fightComment
-
Cotto was unimpressive vs Mayorga, then ran out the clock on Marg's eye, at a catchweight no less.im not sure what this means.did i say floyd has fought opponents that didn't get dropped?what i said was floyds last couple of opponents were coming off big wins that were very impresive for them at the time and you can't say everyone was not making a big deal of ortiz win over berto when it happened maybe now you and others may critcize but at the time ortiz was made out to be a beast for that fightComment
-
go look around the internet for comments that were made about ortiz after he beat berto and compare them to the comments being made about canelo win over trout.who said floyd wouldn't fight canelo i was commentin mainly on the comments of people mentioning maidana and alexander as opponents if you look at floyds last couple opponents they were recognizable names coming off of big wins.The post I was responding to said that all of Mayweather's opposition has come off of great wins where they looked good and that although Canelo won, he didn't look good doing it.
So if Ortiz winning a fight in which he got dropped in is considered looking better than Canelo winning a fight against a guy that he dropped, a guy that had never been dropped before, then I'm not really sure I can agree with that criteria.
canelo is a recgnizable name and he has a good win so he might be nextComment
Comment