Will MEXICAN and/or CANELO fans STAND UP FOR BOXING JUSTICE?

[DARKSEID]

Says the man with the Andre Ward avatar. A master of illegal clinching. WILL THE AMERICANS and/or fans of "SLICK" fighters STAND UP FOR BOXING JUSTICE?

I'm sick to death of these illegal clinchers.

Andre Ward is an illegal clincher? what the hell?

[Khalid X]

No sir, I'm not making Straw Man arguments from the claims you've made. Now, you're conveniently moving the goal posts in our debate. You're practically changing your arguments when I find holes in them.

I simply stated Alvarez won. For whatever reason you can't accept that, and used things like racial bias, crowd influencing my opinion, and other ****** @ss remarks because I don't agree with you.

First, you stated that Compubox support Canelo winning the bout, when in totality, it doesn't. You abandoned that argument.

No, I simply stated that I was at the fight and scored the fight for Alvarez. How in the hell can I use compubox as a basis for my scoring, as If I can magically see that **** while I'm there at the actual event.

Why you can't get that through your head is beyond me.

Secondly, you said that since Canelo landed the harder shots, he's the clear winner. When I pointed out the issue with overemphasis on this factor alone, you've simply ignored it.

Yes....that was one of the many reasons I felt Alvarez won. What's your point again?

Thirdly, now you're trying to disguise your "Power Shots" argument with red herring factors to try to distract from its weakness. First, if you're willing to concede that Trout landed more shots based on your use of Compubox stats, then how could Canelo sensibly have "better" defense. He got hit more, right??

I never said Trout landed more based on compubox. I said he landed more because of what I saw in person. However those where pittypat shots and jabs that didn't do **** to Alvarez for the most part. On the flip side, Canelo landed huges shots constantly throughout the fight, and won several exchanges. His defense also made Trout look like a fool at times.

Sure, Trout was more visibly hurt in exchanges, but, again, you can't just rely on power shots to score fights. Again, Canelo landed less, but the shots he did land were more powerful. This was the issue that I brought up in my hypothetical fight situation where Trout lands 100 to Canelo's 2. You still have ignored this rebuttal.

Hypothetically? Trout didn't land 100 to Canelo's 2, so your arguement is complete ****. I mean what kind of ignorant @ss argument is that, as if that has anything to do with what I said.....especially when I specifically stated that for every 3 or so pittypat shots and jabs Trout landed, Alvarez landed a huge shot.

Again I stated one big shot is better than 3 pitty-pat shots/jabs.

Fourthly, how do you objectively quantify what a pittypat shot from Trout is? Do you have a telepathic connection to the fight in the ring? Have you sparred with Trout? There's just no reasonable basis to claim that Canelo won this based on supposed pittypat shots from Trout? It's really a weak argument...

Telepathic connection to the fight in the ring? How about actually knowing and following the sport for my entire life (just about) and being able to discern a fighters reaction to punches in regards to whether the shot was effective or caused a certain amount of damage. Things like a fighters body language, legs, output, eyes and other small things to tell what shots are harder and causing more damage. To say "telepathic connection" just shows me you either a kid/ or someone who doesn't know **** about boxing.

I'm done with you as you are a ignorant fool who is denial and is hell bent of thinking Trout won.