How should P4P be determined?

[Capncrunch]

I had it even after 8 too. I had it like this (Trout/Cotto):

1. Trout
2. Trout
3. Cotto
4. Cotto
5. Cotto
6. Cotto
7. Trout
8. Trout
9. Trout
10. Trout
11. Trout
12. Trout

Cotto tired during the Floyd fight too. I think Trout beat him just as convincingly. A lot of people scored it 116-112 for Trout, many had it 117-111 Trout too. Just as many people scored it 116-112 for Mayweather, and 117-111 Mayweather. In all, I believe the fights were scored mostly the same way from what I saw in the scoring patterns for those fights

Floyd has the Jones Jr syndrome, where his opponent wins a round just because they didn't get schooled as bad as in the round before, thats the ONLY way the Cotto fight could be scored 8 rounds to 4. 117-111 is the best score.

[LacedUp]

Which is highly hypothetical and really a useless way of comparing fighters. p4p is not of any great use.

I agree.

But don't make it out as if it's a tool for putting the Klitschkos down. SRR really started to promote the term.

"The greatest P4P fighter in the world" Sugar Ray Robinson.