Ring lost credibility as soon as GBP bought them out
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Ring is finished.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987Quote:
Originally Posted by Rome-By-Ko
IMO Donaire Broner and Guerrero out.. Rigo Mares and Froch in..
Those three fighters not being on a p4p list is crazy to me. Especially Rigo and Mares, maybe Froch shouldn't be there because of guys like Donaire and Bradley, but Rigo and Mares being left out kills credibility for any list.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
-
What a disgrace. So there reasoning is Guerrero has a fight SCHEDULED with a pound 4 pound fighter and Broner is SCHEDULED to fight a WW title holder. Well Rigo just schooled a top 5 pound 4 pound fighter!
The Ring's p4p list is a joke.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostI think The Ring's divisional rankings are good.
http://******.craveonline.com/blog/1...friday-mailbag
Everyone on the Ratings Panel agrees that Broner is rated too high on the P4P list and that he shouldn’t be ahead of Donaire. Don’t blame them for the new pound-for-pound rankings. They had no input. Ring editor Michael Rosenthal and I did, but obviously, our opinions fell on deaf ears. The pound-for-pound rankings as it is now is just Chuck Giampa’s list.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostApparently the rating panel only does the divisional rankings. For some reason the p4p rankings are entrusted to Chuck Giampa solely:
http://******.craveonline.com/blog/1...friday-mailbag
Thanks.
Comment
-
Their reasoning is terrible too. How is Rigo not on the list and Why is Donut still there. Broner does deserve to be on the list though. However the fact that Nonito is still on the list and not Rigo who just flat out gave Nonito a boxing lesson is Blasphemous. With the reasoning they have the top P4P fighter should be Hopkins with the way they think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostWhat a disgrace. So there reasoning is Guerrero has a fight SCHEDULED with a pound 4 pound fighter and Broner is SCHEDULED to fight a WW title holder. Well Rigo just schooled a top 5 pound 4 pound fighter!
The Ring's p4p list is a joke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KidneyPunch View PostPacquiao wasn't in the top 5 at the time of his 4th fight with JMM.
How is Pacquiao at #5 now?
There is no way that Pacquiao should be ranked over Bradley despite what your opinion of their match is.
And quite honestly, Donaire/Rigondeaux was more significant than anything that Pacquiao has done since 2008. Rigo faced a #1 reigning champion. Pacquiao hasn't done that in half a decade.
Perhaps that is why some people take offense to such an unjustifiable ranking.
How is there "no way"? Pacquiao beat Bradley, despite the official decision. As stated before, P4P lists arent ironclad to official decisions, which I believe is a great thing. The performance against Bradley cemented Pacquiao's standing in the P4P list, Bradley was an undefeated challenger, who dominated (except Khan) the 140 division. Pound for pound, Pacquiao is a better fighter than Bradley. Sometimes I think people forget what pound for pound actually means, even though it's lustre is far removed.
Sure it was significant, but it's only 1 win. All it shows is that Rigo is masterful against fighters like Donaire, but not any other styles. He has to beat other top fighters in his division to prove he can do that, hence Ward ranks much higher.
Comment
Comment