Originally posted by Jcsuper
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is a better boxer Rigondeaux or Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by PBP View PostPeople need to get off their high horse.
Debates about how Cuban amateur stars would fare among the elites at the pro level have been going on for years. Does Teofilo Stevenson vs. Ali ring a bell?
Rigondeaux is 32 years old. We're seeing an older version of what many claim to be the greatest amateur fighter of all time. Imagine what his reflexes and speed were like at 24? How many world titles would he have won and where would he rank pound for pound?
The Donaire fight was real life evidence that we can now point to and start to wonder how other Cuban fighters in past years would have done if they had the luxury of having their careers babied at a young age and the opportunity to slowly progress through the pro system. It's one fight but its a much bigger deal than a lot of you are making it out to be.
Many credible people in the boxing world have said that he is one of the most skilled fighters they have ever seen. Are there statements ridiculous too?
I'm not saying he's going to become a hall of famer or an ATG. But debates like this are fair game because of the circumstances that Cuban fighters face.
Debates like this are not fair game when he has only beaten one very good fighter. Let's see how he fairs against other good fighters first. We have the luxery of seeing him actually face more pro competition. He has the potential to be better than Floyd sure...
Some people in here already comparing him to top 20 guys like Hopkins and Mayweather is pretty crazy. As good as Donaire was (A HOF most likely) he had been feasting on guys who were suited for his style. We'll see what happens when Rigo fights a guy who can take his best shots and keep on coming. A guy who will get inside and mix it up and get rough with him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jcsuper View PostI dont think it was inflated, he was 33-0-0 with 28 kos. He was coming off a 3 kos strike. I don't see how he was more or less inflated than Donaire was last week.
We'll see what Donaire does after this now but Corrales did a lot after as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Capncrunch View PostHow was that inflated? He trounced Robert Garcia, he trounced Derrick Gainer, Angel Manfredy, John Brown, then later went on to beat Joel, Acelino and Jose Luis. He deserved his spot.
If not, who did at the time?Manfredy and Garcia were decent, but not special and after such a dumb comment I am not going to bother answering such a dumb question. Go away, do some research, watch some fights and stop talking out of your arse.
I swear the level of intelligence here has taken a ****ing nosedive since saturday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostSo how in the **** does what he went on to do affect where he was at the time?....and John Brown...Derrick Gainer???Manfredy and Garcia were decent, but not special and after such a dumb comment I am not going to bother answering such a dumb question. Go away, do some research, watch some fights and stop talking out of your arse.
I swear the level of intelligence here has taken a ****ing nosedive since saturday.
Imagine Donaire countering Corrales to death @ 122.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Antonio- View PostAge is all relative. Rigo is a very young 32. Four round amateur fights do not equal real pro fights. He does not have much wear and tear on him at all.
Debates like this are not fair game when he has only beaten one very good fighter. Let's see how he fairs against other good fighters first. We have the luxery of seeing him actually face more pro competition. He has the potential to be better than Floyd sure...
Some people in here already comparing him to top 20 guys like Hopkins and Mayweather is pretty crazy. As good as Donaire was (A HOF most likely) he had been feasting on guys who were suited for his style. We'll see what happens when Rigo fights a guy who can take his best shots and keep on coming. A guy who will get inside and mix it up and get rough with him.
And I don't think the purpose of this thread was to compare achievements at the pro level. I think it was intended to compare the technical aspects of how they box. Comments like "Donaire is better than anybody Floyd has faced so therefore Rigo" are ridiculous but others have made some very good points that should not be dismissed automatically.
Freddie Roach and Ronnie Shields said he was the most technically skilled fighter they had ever seen. Are they Rigotards/trolls?
I voted Mayweather personally, but I have no problem with this thread. I think it could have been some very good back and forth conversation but the trolling and close-mindedness killed it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostSo how in the **** does what he went on to do affect where he was at the time?....and John Brown...Derrick Gainer???Manfredy and Garcia were decent, but not special and after such a dumb comment I am not going to bother answering such a dumb question. Go away, do some research, watch some fights and stop talking out of your arse.
I swear the level of intelligence here has taken a ****ing nosedive since saturday.
So if Corrales didn't deserve it who did? Simple question.
Comment
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostBoxrec huh? Thats just dumb. Corrales career and acheivements were nowhere near Donaire at that stage, let alone the other talent that was out there at the time. Much like Rigo at this stage, it was just too premature.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostWhat the hell are you talking about? Corrales was by far one of the most hyped guys at the time. I know you weren't watching boxing back then if you'd say some idiotic shit like this.
Go over to Floydhype for a wank or something, cos I aint got nothing for you here.
Comment
Comment