Should there have been a Vitali-Lewis rematch?

[Weltschmerz]

When you can't argue the facts jump right into the insults. Its a classic nuthugger trait.

You're so much shorter than me looking at that picture. I would JAB you down.

[JAB5239]

You're so much shorter than me looking at that picture. I would JAB you down.

When you can't argue the FACTS keepb trying to get the coversation going in another direction. Typical nuthugger diversionary tactics.



http://www.arabnews.com/node/232555

“A lot of different things happened to me in my year out of the ring. Most definitely I’ve been thinking about retiring on a last big super-fight — it could be Vitali Klitschko or Roy Jones."

[LacedUp]

You're so much shorter than me looking at that picture. I would JAB you down.

You wouldn't do ****. Calling people all kinds of things, when truly your sorry self has never even been to a gym. Stop acting tough little guy. You're pathetic.

[JAB5239]

You wouldn't do ****. Calling people all kinds of things, when truly your sorry self has never even been to a gym. Stop acting tough little guy. You're pathetic.

Ignore that and don't let him take you off topic. It's what he wants because he knows I have his ass in a sling with proof Lewis already had plans to retire and owed Vittles nothing.

TKO6

[ShamrockXpress]

I think the fight warranted a rematch but it is what it is. It's the same as saying charr deserves a rematch because the fight was stopped prematurely, vitali didn't dominate like he normally does. If charr goes onto be something will that mean vitali ducked a rematch? Both sides show a bit of revisionist flair, but for me it was a 50/50 fight with vitali being the fresher fighter, so I believe he would have outlasted Lewis. Would he have done this with a prime Lewis? I don't know, but I don't think this was a prime vitali, I think he grew that night in the ring. This was the fight that he proved to himself that he belonged. I don't see the need to insult either fighter, both great in there own right and both should be remembered that way.

[BattlingNelson]

I think the fight warranted a rematch but it is what it is. It's the same as saying charr deserves a rematch because the fight was stopped prematurely, vitali didn't dominate like he normally does.

No. There's a big difference. Vitali was ahead on points in a very exiting fight before the stoppage. Charr was beaten and was never a threat. Furthermore Vitali had been Lummox's mando for years and had been unfairly stalled. Charr was borderline top 10.

[DreamFighter]

Lewis would have been 38 (retirable age for almost every HW champion ever) so OBVIOUSLY no.

Its only not obvious if you are a ****** klitlicker and cant get basic logic about when people retire from sport, and you are ****** enough to call ageing a 'fear'.

On the other hand if Lennox was 30, then there was plenty of room for a rematch, only the of course prime Lennox would have destroyed Vittles twice as fast in those circumstances, and on both occasions.

[thuggery]

Lewis was a little too frightened to make it happen, but yeah there definitely should have been one. I don't blame him though.