Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

According to boxrec, Peterson beat Khan before Garcia did

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • According to boxrec, Peterson beat Khan before Garcia did

    Does that mean Khan was on a losing streak when he fought Molina?

    I'm just curious because reading these threads, it seems we pick and choose what we want to see and hear.

    Here's another example:

    To some, Marquez was robbed in the 3rd fight against Pac (forget what boxrec says), but when presented with a similar situation, Mathysse lost to Alexander (because boxrec said so).

    That said, since Khan actually lost to Peterson, would that make Mathysse' combined wins over Olusegun/Soto > Garcia beating Khan coming off a loss and beating Morales?

  • #2
    i think peterson vs mathysse determines the true number 1 guy in the division, **** the ring magazine and their fake belt

    Comment


    • #3
      I had khan winning by 3points however he was struggling to deal with petersons pressure.

      Comment


      • #4
        man peterson does not deserve jack all

        its a shame golden boy are scum promoters who hide drug cheats they promote and try to force other promoters out by threatening them


        dude is cheating, simple as

        Comment


        • #5
          I always considered a streak 3 or more in a row, 2 loses in a row certainly isn't good and could be the start of a trend.

          Now if a guy losses 2 wins 2 then loses 2 again that is a bit different, but just 2 loses by them self it is not a foregone conclusion that a guy is on the skids.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
            Does that mean Khan was on a losing streak when he fought Molina?

            I'm just curious because reading these threads, it seems we pick and choose what we want to see and hear.

            Here's another example:

            To some, Marquez was robbed in the 3rd fight against Pac (forget what boxrec says), but when presented with a similar situation, Mathysse lost to Alexander (because boxrec said so).

            That said, since Khan actually lost to Peterson, would that make Mathysse' combined wins over Olusegun/Soto > Garcia beating Khan coming off a loss and beating Morales?
            A lot of fans are hypocrites, a lot of them are thick as planks.

            Comment


            • #7
              Khan is the only fighters where losses dont count against him

              I took a look at the Ring rankings ands after losing to peterson and getting KTFO by Garcia and then fighting a LW, Khan is #2 at 140 :lol1

              Pac after losing to Braldey and getting KTFO by JMM, who are 2 of the best in the world, is #4 at 147.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
                Khan is the only fighters where losses dont count against him

                I took a look at the Ring rankings ands after losing to peterson and getting KTFO by Garcia and then fighting a LW, Khan is #2 at 140 :lol1

                Pac after losing to Braldey and getting KTFO by JMM, who are 2 of the best in the world, is #4 at 147.
                i took a look at the WBC rankings and khan is ranked #2 at welterweight O.o

                Comment


                • #9
                  in a shocking development it was revealed that amir khan is actually eric crumble in disguise.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I rank fighters on my own scorecards. But when it fits my agenda to use official scorecards and official records, I will use it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP