So who will be remembered as the greater fighter, Pacquiao or Marquez?

[UTEP]

Clearly many. I love Marquez but the only thing he'll be remembered for is KOing Pac in the final battle. Sorry, but I'm just being real here. I agree with what was said above. Ken Norton is a fave of mine but I'm not going to say he was the greatest just because he had Ali's number.

Yea clearly


You UFC/MMA freaks are something else

[Bretty Poy32]

****** question.

pac's resume is far superior.

it doesn't matter if jmm beat him.

is kobe much better than MJ?

[UTEP]

Was Marquez afraid of fighting Floyd, even though he was a lightweight?

[AnKhang]

Pac has the superior resumé and accomplishments of the two. Although JMM always had Pac's number.

[Left Hook Tua]

is kobe much better than MJ?

of course.

mj is media/nike created hypejob.

larry bird was mj's daddy.

[Left Hook Tua]

Pac has the superior resumé and accomplishments of the two. Although JMM always had Pac's number.

i wouldn't say he had pac's number.

their fights were close (even the ko loss, pac was giving it to jmm as well)

i say bad matchup for pac.

[Tim2daresq]

Pac. Better resume, and imo a more appealing fighting style.

[Left Hook Tua]

I think Marquez is greater because he dared to be great.

dumb

pac won his first belt at 112 at like 19-20.

pac won his 122 belt as a short notice, replacement fighter.

pac fought barrera, jmm, morales in back to back years.

yeah he never dared to be great.


jmm until recent years fought no one. he would price himself out of hamed, pac 2, morales fights.

only his jealousy of pac made him finally step up.

[KickAzz]

Marquez would be nothing without his fights with Pac

[Left Hook Tua]

Pac. Better resume, and imo a more appealing fighting style.

jmm is fun to watch.

his younger years and older years.

he was boring mid years when he didn't have agrressive opponents.

but when he was young and in recent years he's been more aggressive.