Okay, we all know that the counter-punching, power-hitter version of Hagler in 1977-78 was the best 160lber ever.. and that he turned boxer-puncher in the early 80's and proved he could still win fights in the mid 80's (as a face-first brawler) despite his sharpness having faded away loads.
But Floyd is atleast the best since Hagler, maybe even better.
Whitaker and Chavez were the best of the 90's, but Floyd is the best of the last 15 years.
Floyd Mayweather is more skilled than Sugar Ray Robinson ever was, right up there with the man himself, Joe Gans!
He possibly has the most skillful defence ever, and if Ricky Hatton beats him then I say that Ricky has eclipsed his idol Roberto Duran!
And why does he get so much flak from people here??
He's a Brit-nuthugger. Total moron, really. He reads more like an encyclopedia than a boxing fan, quoting random facts, but always taking them out of context, and never showing the other side of the story. Hardly ever offers personal insight into a match or anything, just talks about Eubank all day. He was banned before, probably because he was a tard, and now he's back under this name.
He's a Brit-nuthugger. Total moron, really. He reads more like an encyclopedia than a boxing fan, quoting random facts, but always taking them out of context, and never showing the other side of the story. Hardly ever offers personal insight into a match or anything, just talks about Eubank all day. He was banned before, probably because he was a tard, and
now he's back under this name.
Did you see him make a new alt and kept making threads dissing Benn and British fighters....LOL, what a *****...
He's a Brit-nuthugger. Total moron, really. He reads more like an encyclopedia than a boxing fan, quoting random facts, but always taking them out of context, and never showing the other side of the story. Hardly ever offers personal insight into a match or anything, just talks about Eubank all day. He was banned before, probably because he was a tard, and now he's back under this name.
Does he love Brit fighters too much? It's only natural I guess.
Mayweather has the ability and the talent, but does not have the resume to be considered what this post is claiming him to be. He needs many more fights with the best opposition. As of right now, DLH, Chavez, and Whitaker are greater than PBF. To be great, you must beat the greats, and mayweather has not done that.
Okay, we all know that the counter-punching, power-hitter version of Hagler in 1977-78 was the best 160lber ever.. and that he turned boxer-puncher in the early 80's and proved he could still win fights in the mid 80's (as a face-first brawler) despite his sharpness having faded away loads.
But Floyd is atleast the best since Hagler, maybe even better.
Whitaker and Chavez were the best of the 90's, but Floyd is the best of the last 15 years.
Floyd Mayweather is more skilled than Sugar Ray Robinson ever was, right up there with the man himself, Joe Gans!
He possibly has the most skillful defence ever, and if Ricky Hatton beats him then I say that Ricky has eclipsed his idol Roberto Duran!
Ricardo Lopez.
And Whitaker was incredible IMO. He went uop against Cahvez and De La Hoya, who are both renound offensive fighters, and they couldnt land a decent shot on him.
Duran is an all time great, its a bizarre statement to say if Hatton beats Mayweather he will be better.
Thats ***in crazy.
Hatton has along way to go before being regarded as an alltime great.
Duran was incredible at lightweight, not because ive heard people say so, but because ive watched many of his fights.
PLUS i dont understand ur dislike of Robinson.
Seriously, in every post u try to mention Gans, and say how crap Robinson was.
Comment