Terrible Boxrec Rankings for 140

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #11
    Originally posted by Exciterx22
    I ain't interested in getting anyone flustered or whatever. I ain't saying boxrec this or boxrec that in general. I brought to attention the fact that they have a premier fighter below the top 10. Nothing else.

    That's fine, but the counter point is that there's a thread that's saying "What the hell is wrong with Boxrec's rankings" every two weeks.

    If you look at all the weight classes and pound for pound rankings, they're all out to lunch.

    This is because no one is supposed to take their rankings seriously. They're primary purpose is to be a data base for fighters. They always have been working on a computer generated auto rankings system that does strange things.

    No one seems to know this, and every couple of weeks, there's a "What's up with Boxrec" thread.

    Comment

    • Exciterx30
      El Intocable Bass Machine
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 3867
      • 179
      • 64
      • 10,669

      #12
      Originally posted by Bozo_no no
      That's fine, but the counter point is that there's a thread that's saying "What the hell is wrong with Boxrec's rankings" every two weeks.

      If you look at all the weight classes and pound for pound rankings, they're all out to lunch.

      This is because no one is supposed to take their rankings seriously. They're primary purpose is to be a data base for fighters. They always have been working on a computer generated auto rankings system that does strange things.

      No one seems to know this, and every couple of weeks, there's a "What's up with Boxrec" thread.

      Anyway, I ain't starting a protest movement against Boxrec or whatever. In fact, I think it is very good to have a source to find the records of pro boxers. However, this computer ranking is the complete opposite of the data source, because it might give the casual fan a wrong idea about who is who in boxing. I know my boxers, so it's okay, but some might actually think that these rankings are official.

      By the way, I know about the computer method.

      Comment

      • Bozo_no no
        Palabras de Piedra
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 8906
        • 416
        • 496
        • 16,069

        #13
        Originally posted by Exciterx22
        Anyway, I ain't starting a protest movement against Boxrec or whatever. In fact, I think it is very good to have a source to find the records of pro boxers. However, this computer ranking is the complete opposite of the data source, because it might give the casual fan a wrong idea about who is who in boxing. I know my boxers, so it's okay, but some might actually think that these rankings are official.

        I hear what you're saying, but that's the way it is, and the way it has been for years, which is why it's tiresome to see someone perplexed by it every couple of weeks.

        Comment

        • moochi
          We need one organization!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 3444
          • 378
          • 60
          • 26,344

          #14
          Originally posted by Exciterx22
          Anyway, I ain't starting a protest movement against Boxrec or whatever. In fact, I think it is very good to have a source to find the records of pro boxers. However, this computer ranking is the complete opposite of the data source, because it might give the casual fan a wrong idea about who is who in boxing. I know my boxers, so it's okay, but some might actually think that these rankings are official.

          By the way, I know about the computer method.
          first of all, correct your english..........I ain't??? I'm not .... .....

          you went out of your way to make a thread against boxrec....you are not meant to take their rankings seriously at all, but, as mentioned by Bozo_yes_yes, view their database of fighters and records.....

          The database is the best i have ever seen....and every time you want to learn about a fighter, you visit www.boxrec.com and you view the stats on that particular fighter........not to mention view dates of upcoming fights and undercards of certain shows.......

          Comment

          • Exciterx30
            El Intocable Bass Machine
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 3867
            • 179
            • 64
            • 10,669

            #15
            Originally posted by moochi
            first of all, correct your english..........I ain't??? I'm not .... .....

            you went out of your way to make a thread against boxrec....you are not meant to take their rankings seriously at all, but, as mentioned by Bozo_yes_yes, view their database of fighters and records.....

            The database is the best i have ever seen....and every time you want to learn about a fighter, you visit www.boxrec.com and you view the stats on that particular fighter........not to mention view dates of upcoming fights and undercards of certain shows.......
            Listen here. You don't need to correct squat. I type in a different way here. My grammar is as good as it gets, since I am an English major. One more semester and I'll have my BA. Besides, that's not the point.

            Second, I gave credit to Boxrec's database and just criticized their ranking because they can deceive the casual fan. It's not my problem if it offended you. I already explained my point of view regarding the subject.

            Comment

            • Hitman932
              I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 14910
              • 1,180
              • 836
              • 28,259

              #16
              Originally posted by Xanxicar
              lol boxrec ranking is a joke :P . they have Chris BYRD as a No1 HW in the world, isnt that proof enough of their ranking being JOKE :P. miguel cotto is easily a Top5 140 pounder in the world. and NOT freakin 12
              nicolai valuev as the number 2 heavy is just as ****** if not moreso.

              Comment

              • Hitman932
                I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 14910
                • 1,180
                • 836
                • 28,259

                #17
                boxrec rankings are not determined by a computer but by the guy in bozo's avatar, he is what we call a "math whiz" he can do a couple theorems and tell you who will win any fight.

                Comment

                • moochi
                  We need one organization!
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 3444
                  • 378
                  • 60
                  • 26,344

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Exciterx22
                  Listen here. You don't need to correct squat. I type in a different way here. My grammar is as good as it gets, since I am an English major. One more semester and I'll have my BA. Besides, that's not the point.

                  Second, I gave credit to Boxrec's database and just criticized their ranking because they can deceive the casual fan. It's not my problem if it offended you. I already explained my point of view regarding the subject.
                  English major? I just asked you to correct your english!....but if you really are an English Grammar Major, I'd like to know which college you are studying at!....

                  back to cotto......the only reason why it shows him that low is because his opponents of late have been really really low!...

                  Comment

                  • Exciterx30
                    El Intocable Bass Machine
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 3867
                    • 179
                    • 64
                    • 10,669

                    #19
                    Originally posted by moochi
                    English major? I just asked you to correct your english!....but if you really are an English Grammar Major, I'd like to know which college you are studying at!....

                    back to cotto......the only reason why it shows him that low is because his opponents of late have been really really low!...
                    Listen, cut the routine. You can check all my posts and you won't find many if any grammatical mistakes.

                    By the way, proper names start with capital letters, ok? Remember that before trying to be Mr. Wise. Also remember that sentences start with a capital letter or capitalized word.

                    Comment

                    • moochi
                      We need one organization!
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2004
                      • 3444
                      • 378
                      • 60
                      • 26,344

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Exciterx22
                      Listen, cut the routine. You can check all my posts and you won't find many if any grammatical mistakes.

                      By the way, proper names start with capital letters, ok? Remember that before trying to be Mr. Wise. Also remember that sentences start with a capital letter or capitalized word.
                      i know where my grammar mistakes are, but they are only in writing as it is difficult on my keyboard to always press shift+letter as i have a laptop. but you were using a word that was very very low for someone of a high school education! i won't even mention the major bit!

                      ask yourself: why do i (educated person) need to write/say "i ain't", when i know that it is totally wrong?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP