Whoever Haye fights this time around....it's just a stay busy fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Steve Bunce: 'Manuel Charr is a credible opponent for David Haye'.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by freedomAnd the Klitschko haters ridiculed Vitali for fighting Charr when he was undefeated, but approve of him as an opponent for Haye. Is that a double standard?
But the reality is completely the opposit - Klitman actually went out and fought Charr, as a title defence. Haye hasnt done anything with CHarr yet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostKinda like Vitaly in that sense, huh?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BostonGuy View PostYou just can't get Vitali off yer mind can you? How can you imply that Vitali is risk adverse? He made title defenses against a solid bunch of opponents and he tried on numerous occasions to make a Haye fight to no avail.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostLol, a solid bunch of opponents? Yeah, a true murderer's row. And now you implying Haye will avoid Charr for being to risky is the same as me implying Vittles won't fight Haye for the same reason. Ain't that a *****!
Why should Vitali attempt to negotiate with him again when he has more lucrative paydays with credible opponents?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BostonGuy View PostYou've followed the sport for the last 5 years so you should know - David Haye is notoriously difficult to negotiate with and numerous fights between him and Vitali have fallen through. The guy's a ****in primadonna and b1tch.
Why should Vitali attempt to negotiate with him again when he has more lucrative paydays with credible opponents?
Vits has more lucrative paydays with more credible opponents? Ok, who? And you can say Haye is difficult to deal with all you want. I don't doubt that is true. But lets not pretend K2 is easy to deal with especially when several fighters have spoken directly about that. In the end, Vits said it was personal and not about money...but he's still haggling about money. See the UK PPV which forced one of their fights to fall through. As a Klit fan you can blame Haye all you want. Im simply not buying that though.Last edited by JAB5239; 04-02-2013, 12:42 PM.
Comment
-
FFS i hope it's not Charr he's terrible, god damn Klitschko's making guys like this relevant.
Still wouldn't be as bad as Vitali choosing him though, Haye's not a title holder, Charr is more known and he's challenged for a world title. He was a nobody when Vitali cherry picked him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BostonGuy View PostYou've followed the sport for the last 5 years so you should know - David Haye is notoriously difficult to negotiate with and numerous fights between him and Vitali have fallen through. The guy's a ****in primadonna and b1tch.
Why should Vitali attempt to negotiate with him again when he has more lucrative paydays with credible opponents?
Wlad doesn't even believe the offer last year was genuine.
"There is nothing that could be made," Klitschko told Sky Sports News.
"First of all David Haye was officially retired, he didn't have a licence so there couldn't be any conversation.
"And right now, he's actually getting ready for the Chisora fight."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Own3d View PostFFS i hope it's not Charr he's terrible, god damn Klitschko's making guys like this relevant.
Still wouldn't be as bad as Vitali choosing him though, Haye's not a title holder, Charr is more known and he's challenged for a world title. He was a nobody when Vitali cherry picked him.
Manuel Charr is actually better opponent for Haye than Andrew Wawrzyk (BoxRec #45) because he's sturdy and has a decent chin.
Charr has had a few wins over boxers who were top 100 when he fought them, such as Gbenga Oloukun.
Wawrzyk has been knocked down by low-level journeymen and has never beaten a single top 100 HW opponent.
Comment
Comment