As for now who is better fighter P4P, Golovkin or Broner?
Collapse
-
-
oh, and it's broner, and it's not close. demarco was the top rated LW in the world when he fought broner, and broner absolutely demolished him.Comment
-
The battle of the hype jobs. I say Broner has a little more credibility because he did win against DeMarco.Comment
-
But hes not that is the thing and I find it impossible to evaluate a fighter when hes fought nothing but stiffs.
Do I see talent? Absolutely.
I see a bit of Mike Tyson in him actually.
But I have seen so many guys who have looked like absolute killers that have took a marginal step up and got laced time & time again.
When you're fighting journeyman who are a weight class below its actually pretty difficult to not look good.
You can't just tell me that Ishida and Rosado are the best that were willing.
Hes an olympic gold medalist, hes had 30 pro fights and still not beaten **** and people want to mock Rigondeaux and his competition.Comment
-
Comment
-
Broner is more than 5yrs younger, has a better resume and has looked just as good if not better in his recent fights. Yea not a hard choice.Comment
-
About a dozen guys 160 would make it through Golvokin's resume without a loss. As much as I think Broner may be overhyped, I don't think you can say the same about him, he's probably in the top 20 p4p at this point.Comment
Comment