David Haye vs Manuel Charr?? For real?

[Jam Jars]

Haye also said that Audley Harrison was a complete joke, a nobody and that he would never fight him because it wasnt a fight worth making. Then announced that Audley was his next fight. The quotes are out there but I cant be bothered looking them up.

He openly admitted it was a money fight from the beginning, there was a large demand for the fight in the UK.

[luki29]

maybe he will fight Martin Rogan? good fight for a comeback

[Jam Jars]

The same people who ridiculed and bashed Vitali for fighting Charr when he was undefeated...

...are now saying Charr, despite his one-sided loss to old Vitali, is an acceptable opponent for Haye!



I'll watch it though. Charr is durable and at least he's not old and faded like Barrett, Ruiz and Harrison.

People expect (rightfully so) that title holders fight generally better opposition than contenders. Charr is a rubbish fight, but don't try and twist it like Haye fighting him is worse than Vitali. Charr is by far more known now and has had a world title fight, if we apply the same logic as Klitschko fans he didn't really lose either because it was stopped because of a cut. You can thank Vitali for making Charr relevant.

[Jam Jars]

maybe he will fight Martin Rogan? good fight for a comeback

Rogan beat another Vitali cherry pick Sosnowski a few weeks ago, just goes to show the garbage the Klitschko's will fight.

[White_Knight]

Tyson Fury would indeed be solid (easy win for Haye though), but he wont fight Haye when he is one easy fight away from a world title shot.

The winner of Fury-Cunningham will have to beat Pulev to become a mandatory.