David Haye vs Manuel Charr?? For real?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I really dont think its Haye's style to fight a complete loser. That's the prerogative of a true fakir.Comment
-
If he wants to be relevant he should take three, if not two of these fights:
Arreola
Pulev
Povetkin
Fury
Chagaev?
Thompson
Chambers
Scott
JenningsComment
-
We will see who he signs to fight....
IF it is Charr i for one will be a bit disappointed but i could see the logic, trying to out do Vitali's win and force a fight...
But basically im just happy to have Haye back in the ring at all!Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Haye and Adam Booth hinted in the press conference recently that Manuel Charr might be a possible opponent for Haye. And here is what I think about it: I remember when Vitali Klitschko beat Charr recently, David Haye said afterwards that Charr is a complete nobody, a completely undeserving fighter.
And now suddenly Charr is a great opponent for Haye?
Don't get me wrong, I respect any boxer, so I also respect Manuel Charr. That being said, David Haye continues to bull**** the boxing fans. If he wants to fight a high level guy in a real title eliminator, why doesn't he fight Chris Arreola or Kubrat Pulev? The answer is cause he might actually lose to those guys.
Haye also said that Audley Harrison was a complete joke, a nobody and that he would never fight him because it wasnt a fight worth making. Then announced that Audley was his next fight. The quotes are out there but I cant be bothered looking them up.Comment
Comment