Lou DiBella going in hard against Broner

[Doctor_Tenma]

I'm not disagreeing with you but again, it's one thing to do something wrong another is to relish in it and be proud of it.



Dumbest ***in post ever.....

When I buy drinks at a bar or go to the movies, I get drinks and watch a movie in return.....LOL

Do you see how that works? I pay for a product or service, big difference.

When I flush $20s down the toilet, I cream my pants in return, do you see how that works?

[The Big Dunn]

All of you need to get this thru your thick heads, Broner can do as he pleases with his disposable income. He earned and if he wants to burn it, flush it, wipe his ass with it or donate it its his decision.

If you dont like what broner did with his money step away from the keyboard, find a way to earn what broner does, and then after you pay your bills use your disposable income the way you choose.

[THE REED]

All of you need to get this thru your thick heads, Broner can do as he pleases with his disposable income. He earned and if he wants to burn it, flush it, wipe his ass with it or donate it its his decision.

We're all quite aware of that, just as we are in the right to call him a fucktard for doing so.

[FeFist]

Yes, it's an idiotic reply.

If I buy a drink at a bar, it's not a waste because I GOT SOMETHING TO DRINK IN RETURN.

I feel ****** just having to explain that.

What you just explained is not something I overlooked it is simply irrelevant. Yes you get something when you buy a drink at a bar but you are incorrectly assuming that you or Broner would get nothing from flushing money down a toilet. For his money he received attention and possibly a sense of satisfaction.

Also....
Money burning or burning money is the purposeful act of destroying money. In the prototypical example, banknotes are destroyed by literally setting them on fire. Burning money decreases the wealth of the owner without directly enriching any particular party. However, according to the quantity theory of money, because it reduces the supply of money it increases the value of the remaining money, increasing (by roughly the same amount as the money burnt) the collective wealth of everyone else who holds money.

His actions only hurt himself whilst, arguably, enriching everyone who has a dime to their name.

[UTEP]

Hahaha, love this dude..



Lou DiBella @loudibella 24 Mar
RT @sean_@PaulMalignaggi Lou, you forgot "Handbag snatching"... RAN OUTTA LETTERS or would have added Vanilla Ice Rapping PUNK !!!




The last one is classic, I love DiBella, he's one of my favorite boxing personalities.

This is why I know Paulie visits this website alot.

[Doctor_Tenma]

What you just explained is not something I overlooked it is simply irrelevant. Yes you get something when you buy a drink at a bar but you are incorrectly assuming that Broner would get nothing from flushing money down a toilet. For his money he received attention and possibly a sense of satisfaction.

Also....
Money burning or burning money is the purposeful act of destroying money. In the prototypical example, banknotes are destroyed by literally setting them on fire. Burning money decreases the wealth of the owner without directly enriching any particular party. However, according to the quantity theory of money, because it reduces the supply of money it increases the value of the remaining money, increasing (by roughly the same amount as the money burnt) the collective wealth of everyone else who holds money.

Bingo!

Hence why I said post #31

[THE REED]

His actions only hurt himself whilst, arguably, enriching everyone who has a dime to their name.

lmao... gtfoh, seriously.


Broner just increased the value of the dollar for everyone.

[FeFist]

Economist Steven Landsburg proposes in The Armchair Economist that burning one's fortune (in paper money) is a form of philanthropy more egalitarian than deeding it to the United States Treasury.[1] In 1920, Thomas Nixon Carver wrote that dumping money into the sea is better for society than spending it wastefully, as the latter wastes the labor that it hires.[2]

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

All of you need to get this thru your thick heads, Broner can do as he pleases with his disposable income. He earned and if he wants to burn it, flush it, wipe his ass with it or donate it its his decision.

If you dont like what broner did with his money step away from the keyboard, find a way to earn what broner does, and then after you pay your bills use your disposable income the way you choose.

Or we can just sit here and criticize him as we please.




Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[RVABoxer]

What you just explained is not something I overlooked it is simply irrelevant. Yes you get something when you buy a drink at a bar but you are incorrectly assuming that you or Broner would get nothing from flushing money down a toilet. For his money he received attention and possibly a sense of satisfaction.

Also....
Money burning or burning money is the purposeful act of destroying money. In the prototypical example, banknotes are destroyed by literally setting them on fire. Burning money decreases the wealth of the owner without directly enriching any particular party. However, according to the quantity theory of money, because it reduces the supply of money it increases the value of the remaining money, increasing (by roughly the same amount as the money burnt) the collective wealth of everyone else who holds money.

His actions only hurt himself whilst, arguably, enriching everyone who has a dime to their name.

But its supposed to be the Fed burning money what Broner did is illegal and idiotic and the only way it enriched people is by making them feel better that they are not that dumb. I had a dollar in my pocket before Broner ripped up that $20 and I can buy the same **** with that dollar now that i could before he ripped it up. Basically our money is borrowed from the federal gov't to keep in circulation not destroy like a moron for our amusement