Tweet
Okay but floyd isnt in his prime anymore either. And in that fight cotto was still bigger, stronger, and more comfortable at the weight. He proved that when he gave a Floyd a hard fight to point that he even bled. But Floyd still took his title. The point I'm making is that even though floyd fought cotto later he was still at a disadvantage in regards to size and power. But yet he still took Cotto's title. You haters are making it seem like Cotto was a walking zombie when he fought Floyd but that wasnt the case.
You can't use the whole "he was past his prime" excuse anymore cause Floyd is too. I mean he's damn near 40 now. His past couple of opponents have been younger, bigger and stronger and his current opponent also fits that criteria. So I don't understand why people are still using the undersize old person claim. Stop living in the past and move on. But yet no one gives pacquiao this criticism even thoough he's fought some of the same opponents.
You can't use the whole "he was past his prime" excuse anymore cause Floyd is too. I mean he's damn near 40 now. His past couple of opponents have been younger, bigger and stronger and his current opponent also fits that criteria. So I don't understand why people are still using the undersize old person claim. Stop living in the past and move on. But yet no one gives pacquiao this criticism even thoough he's fought some of the same opponents.
Comment