Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mike Tyson tweeting about Timothy Bradley

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I'll be the first to say pacman did NOT look good against bradley, honestly watching it live it just felt like he didnt give a ****.

    But he still did way more than bradley did in that fight. No way in hell did bradley deserve that fight. I scored it 7-5 pac giving bradley the benefit of the doubt in some rounds where they both looked like ****.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by xenotactics View Post
      [/U][/U]

      When a priest buttfucks all those poor children and keeps a straight face when he says its in the name of god...its legit as well, right? Ask the children...
      Whoa. Calm down man. It's really not THAT serious.

      Comment


      • #43
        if i remember correctly tyson had bradley losing the fight and screaming robbery

        Comment


        • #44
          Tim had issues with weight coming into this fight and took off too much too fast, that's why he weighed so much on fight night because he had to drain himself to make the weigh-in weight. He also slept on Ruslan thinking it would be an easy fight and paid the price.

          I don't think he will be making those kinds of mistakes moving forward.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by mathed View Post
            Tim had issues with weight coming into this fight and took off too much too fast, that's why he weighed so much on fight night because he had to drain himself to make the weigh-in weight. He also slept on Ruslan thinking it would be an easy fight and paid the price.

            I don't think he will be making those kinds of mistakes moving forward.
            I hope your right,Tim did not fight smart at all..By the time he listened to his corner it was to late..He was hurt and would not recover for the rest of the fight..

            I want Bradley Marquez next(and there looks to be a strong chance that this happens)Bradley can't afford to make the same mistakes against a vet like Marquez..Marquez will end Bradley if he does..Bradley needs to get back to fighting smart,he is not this toe to toe warrior..Bradley is a warrior no doubt,but he uses his brains and boxing ability,not brute strength to win fights..

            Lucky for Bradley that he has not taken a lot of damage throughout his career..But that fight with Prov has to have taken something from him..

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Pacquiaoifyable View Post
              I can't remember the rounds I gave to Bradley off the top of my head, but I find it amusing that you can give Bradley 5 rounds and then tell ME that I'm not very good at scoring fights.

              It's the same story with Mayweather-Cotto. How people thought that was a close fight is beyond me. Off the top of my head, I gave Mayweather 9 rounds, quite possibly even 10, I'm not sure. Quite a few people had it a draw and some even had Cotto winning the fight. Just as ridiculous as anyone that scored the Pacquiao-Bradley fight a draw or a win for Bradley, IMO.

              As for my username, yeah my favourite current fighter is Pacquiao so there might be a little bias there, but I like to think that when I score a fight that I don't show any favouritism. I know that some people are such huge fans of fighters they support them more than they support the actual sport, which is just ridiculous and definitely not the case with me.
              You didn't even post a scorecard and your telling me that "giving" Bradley 5 rounds (6 by the way) means I don't know how to score. Watch the fight and answer this question honestly. What did pacquiao do to win any of the last 4 rounds ?

              Comment


              • #47
                Always great to see how butt hurt some of you are about Bradley getting the decision over Pacquiao.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by jayjames616 View Post
                  Always great to see how butt hurt some of you are about Bradley getting the decision over Pacquiao.
                  100% agreed.

                  By the way I am a huge Bradley fan and I scored his fight against Pacquiao 8-4 for Pacquiao but there were TONS of close rounds that could have gone either way. Rounds 1 and 2 were strong Bradley rounds and he has a case for winning most of 7-12 on activity. Manny didn't do much in those rounds outside of Ali-style flurries in the last 30 seconds of them.

                  Tim out-threw Manny which is something a lot of people miss when talking about the decision.

                  And btw something to remember is both the Vegas crowd and the HBO team were horribly biased toward Pacquiao and against Bradley. To hear the way they commentated the fight you would think Pacquiao was hitting Bradley with megaton bombs. In exchanges where both fighters landed punches the HBO team would only give credit to Pacquiao's activity. It was one of the most shameful examples of cheerleading from them in recent memory.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    A fight with Marquez makes a lot of sense for both guys. Marquez wants a fifth world title and frankly there's an argument to be made that he should have Bradley's title two different ways, but instead he was robbed in the third fight against Pacquiao and then Manny was robbed of the title in the Bradley fight instead of keeping it and losing it to Marquez later in the year.

                    I have no idea how the styles clash will turn out in that one, but I think it would be a big mistake to read too much into Bradley's showing against Provodnikov. Bradley is a good infighter when he uses his head movement and footwork to put pressure on his opponents. Marquez is a world-class counterpuncher but I'm not sure how great he'll be with Bradley sitting on his chest the whole night.

                    Either way I think it would be a great fight between two highly skilled fighters.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
                      You didn't even post a scorecard and your telling me that "giving" Bradley 5 rounds (6 by the way) means I don't know how to score. Watch the fight and answer this question honestly. What did pacquiao do to win any of the last 4 rounds ?
                      Firstly, I didn't say you don't know how to score fights. What I did say was that I found it comical how you questioned my scoring when you seem to be trying to justify that utter farce of a decision.

                      Secondly, he done enough to win two of the last four rounds IMO. He wasn't really active, yet he still managed to outscore Bradley and land the bigger punches. Bradley may have moved more and threw more punches, but it was mostly in vein. Pacquiao showed better defence in that fight than any other in recent memory. He managed to block most of Bradley's attacks with his arms and gloves.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP