Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mike Tyson tweeting about Timothy Bradley

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Big Rigg View Post
    But then he got rocked again at the end. Did he choose to fight reckless or did he just happen to get rocked again???
    You mean at the end of the 12th round? Dude was going in on it again. All Tim had to do was move around and box because Ruslan couldn't cut the ring off and stop him.
    If there's a rematch, a lot of people are going to be disappointed there won't be as much action as the first

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Pacquiaoifyable View Post
      I still had it 10-2 Pacquiao, and quite comfortably at that.

      Strange that Mike thinks Bradley beat Pacquiao considering his boxing knowledge is so vast. No way in hell was that even close to the right decision.
      Well you obviously know more than mike.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by HtotheZ View Post

        Mike Tyson ‏@MikeTyson 55m

        He has the potential but he didn't dominate against Provodnikov. Pacquiao was 10 x's faster than Provodnikov and Bradley beat him.
        Go home Mike, you're drunk.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
          Well you obviously know more than mike.
          ???

          You'll find that >90% of anyone that knows how to score fights will have given Pacquiao the decision, and the majority of those people will have given him it by several rounds.

          Comment


          • #15
            Say what you want about who mike thinks won between pacman vs bradley but Mike is absolutely right in the sense that Pacman is a faster, harder opponent than Provodnikov but Bradley put on a much more masterful performance against Pacman. Bradley barely looked hurt post fight compared to how he looked after the Provodnikov fight.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by HtotheZ View Post
              Mike Tyson ‏@MikeTyson 57m

              Timothy Bradley needs to go back to fighting smart if he wants to be a "GREAT".


              Mike Tyson ‏@MikeTyson 55m

              He has the potential but he didn't dominate against Provodnikov. Pacquiao was 10 x's faster than Provodnikov and Bradley beat him.

              Mike Tyson ‏@MikeTyson 53m

              I'm routing for Timothy Bradley. Moving forward, I'd like to see him focus on fighting smart (like he has in the past).



              I agree with him aside from Bradley beating Pacquiao. I think it's interesting to see what he had to say about dude, and I think it's dope that he's routing for him
              You guys are getting on Mike for saying Tim beat Pac??? F#ck, did you guys forget who won?

              Comment


              • #17
                can't get mad at Mike. He was only stating the obvious, Bradley did win the fight. No L's on his record. it is what it is

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Pacquiaoifyable View Post
                  ???

                  You'll find that >90% of anyone that knows how to score fights will have given Pacquiao the decision, and the majority of those people will have given him it by several rounds.
                  I don't really care what 90% of people say you said yourself you scored it 10-2. Which either shows an extreme bias (PACquiaoifyable) or that you just aren't very good at scoring fights. I'm almost positive you scored the 10th for Bradley and if I had to guess you may have scored the 11th or 1st for Bradley also. What did pacquiao do to win these rounds ? 1,2,7,9,10,11,12 ?
                  Ive scored the fight for pacquiao and ive also scored it a draw Here's one of my scorecards.

                  1. Bradley
                  2. Bradley?
                  3. PAC
                  4. PAC
                  5. PAC.
                  6. PAC ?
                  7. PAC ?
                  8. PAC
                  9. Bradley ?
                  10. Bradley
                  11. Bradley
                  12. Bradley ?

                  All the rounds with question marks were close and could've went either way. To have it 10-2 is much more ridiculous than any statement mike Tyson has made.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
                    I don't really care what 90% of people say you said yourself you scored it 10-2. Which either shows an extreme bias (PACquiaoifyable) or that you just aren't very good at scoring fights. I'm almost positive you scored the 10th for Bradley and if I had to guess you may have scored the 11th or 1st for Bradley also. What did pacquiao do to win these rounds ? 1,2,7,9,10,11,12 ?
                    Ive scored the fight for pacquiao and ive also scored it a draw Here's one of my scorecards.

                    1. Bradley
                    2. Bradley?
                    3. PAC
                    4. PAC
                    5. PAC.
                    6. PAC ?
                    7. PAC ?
                    8. PAC
                    9. Bradley ?
                    10. Bradley
                    11. Bradley
                    12. Bradley ?

                    All the rounds with question marks were close and could've went either way. To have it 10-2 is much more ridiculous than any statement mike Tyson has made.
                    Jeff Mayweather and Danny Garcia both scored it 10-2. 9-3 was the average press score:

                    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...imothy_Bradley

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      kimbo would whoop that azz, tyson wants one. lol he ducked bob sapp lmfao

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP