Under the WBC's rules, Klitschko filed a protest in December and eventually his case against the WBC and Maskaev went to the CAS, the body such matters are referred to, under the WBC's rules, for binding arbitration.
If what the CAS says is binding, does this mean the WBC has no power to allow Martinez-Chavez before Rubio? I guess there's step aside money.
Under the WBC's rules, Klitschko filed a protest in December and eventually his case against the WBC and Maskaev went to the CAS, the body such matters are referred to, under the WBC's rules, for binding arbitration.
If what the CAS says is binding, does this mean the WBC has no power to allow Martinez-Chavez before Rubio? I guess there's step aside money.
Oh for ****s sakes, they have another body? Where was this body to enforce Matthysse vs Garcia or Lara vs Canelo or Martinez vs Chavez way back then? ****ing boxing.
"Martinez can fight in April and then (if he beats Murray) he has to challenge Rubio"
I'm sorry but did Kuchle just say Martinez has to challenge Rubio? and I thought Chavez was high lol. in what world does Martinez, the lineal champ, have to challenge someone who is looking for a title shot? or more specifically, in what world does Martinez have to challenge Rubio? the champion accepts challenges, he doesn't issue them against b level fighters.
"Martinez can fight in April and then (if he beats Murray) he has to challenge Rubio"
I'm sorry but did Kuchle just say Martinez has to challenge Rubio? and I thought Chavez was high lol. in what world does Martinez, the lineal champ, have to challenge someone who is looking for a title shot? or more specifically, in what world does Martinez have to challenge Rubio? the champion accepts challenges, he doesn't issue them against b level fighters.
Comment