Originally posted by Midas
Who deserves to be ranked higher
Collapse
-
Thats dumb. It's not suppose to be the same. Just because he got offered more to fight Hatton doesnt mean the money was enough. Look how much more Hatton brings in then does Urkal. If you think he offered Harris his fair market value then your crazyOriginally posted by MidasThe money offered for Hatton was more than double offered for Urkal, Harris took the short money and easy fight.Comment
-
Damn man I guess you must either be a really close friend or family member or some ****, because no matter how much evidence gets put in front of you you still somehow refuse to see it.
Oh and are you still convinced that everybody else feels the same way about this as you do, and that all of us that disagree must not know **** about boxing?Comment
-
WTF, your crazy!!Originally posted by DLTThats dumb. It's not suppose to be the same. Just because he got offered more to fight Hatton doesnt mean the money was enough. Look how much more Hatton brings in then does Urkal. If you think he offered Harris his fair market value then your crazy
Urkal sells tickets in Germany, he fills the stadiums out.
Even if Urkal brings less money to the table its still a fight, Harris still has to train for 3months and step in the ring in another country for half what he could earn! If Hatton's such an easy win for him then why wouldnt he take the best payday of his career and make a name for himself? if he had beaten Hatton he would sell a lot more tickets now.
Harris's fair market value is nothing, nobody wants to see him fight so he's fooling himself by thinking he's worth more than Hatton offered.
I think Harris is a very good fighter but he's an idiot out of the ring. IMO Harris pussied out against Hatton because he knew it was a hard fight, he knew he'd lose part of his purse though the bet with Hatton.Comment
-
You keep talking about evidence like he has the best resume in boxing. I still havent seen the evidence and the evidence I did see isnt that great to me. Were just going to have to leave it at that.Originally posted by jayschreDamn man I guess you must either be a really close friend or family member or some ****, because no matter how much evidence gets put in front of you you still somehow refuse to see it.
Oh and are you still convinced that everybody else feels the same way about this as you do, and that all of us that disagree must not know **** about boxing?
You have to please forgive littile ole me if I have failed to see the greatness of wins over Baily, Pinto, and N'DouComment
-
Dude, before this ends let me point out two things: 1. Never once have I stated that he has the best resume` of all time! I am simply stating that IMO Cotto has a better resume` than Harris!Originally posted by DLTYou keep talking about evidence like he has the best resume in boxing. I still havent seen the evidence and the evidence I did see isnt that great to me. Were just going to have to leave it at that.
You have to please forgive littile ole me if I have failed to see the greatness of wins over Baily, Pinto, and N'Dou
2. You yap on and on about how Cotto hasn't fought anybody yet. Then when called to make your point aka state your rebuttal you throw out M`Baye and Urkal like they are undeniable accomplishments, yet you never even try to back it up with anything else!
So just fyi maybe before you start knocking a fighters level of comp. by saying that he fights guys who have only beaten nobodies, you might wanna check some of your guys opponents out first. Because there aint a whole lot there with the exception of Hurtado( who like I've said already besides a win over Bailey who else has he beaten!Comment
-
That just shows that you dont know me because I have also said that Harris hasnt really fought anyone either. I just said that he has fought better people then Cotto and you have disagreed. We both know who their opponents are and we still dont agree so for us to keep debating this is meaninglessOriginally posted by jayschreDude, before this ends let me point out two things: 1. Never once have I stated that he has the best resume` of all time! I am simply stating that IMO Cotto has a better resume` than Harris!
2. You yap on and on about how Cotto hasn't fought anybody yet. Then when called to make your point aka state your rebuttal you throw out M`Baye and Urkal like they are undeniable accomplishments, yet you never even try to back it up with anything else!
So just fyi maybe before you start knocking a fighters level of comp. by saying that he fights guys who have only beaten nobodies, you might wanna check some of your guys opponents out first. Because there aint a whole lot there with the exception of Hurtado( who like I've said already besides a win over Bailey who else has he beaten!Comment
-
Agreed, Dude as I may have said earlier no hard feelings I enjoyed the spirited debate and I hope we can pick this back up if and when these two square up in the ring, Hopefully sooner than later. Good Times ahead!Originally posted by DLTThat just shows that you dont know me because I have also said that Harris hasnt really fought anyone either. I just said that he has fought better people then Cotto and you have disagreed. We both know who their opponents are and we still dont agree so for us to keep debating this is meaninglessComment
Comment