Tweet
I think Canelo, I'll try to post a poll
-
-
Canelo? WTF hell no.
Broner. Hell, DeMarco alone outdoes everything in Canelo's resume.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android -
Obviously Broner. I like neither guy so I have nothing to sell with bias.Comment
-
So, tell me who in Canelo's resume is a better win than DeMarco?Originally posted by pesticid
Look man, whether you think DeMarco sucks or not that's not the point. The point is he was prime and the #1 guy when Broner beat him. Who comes remotely close to that in Canelo's resume?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
broner. demarco is a bigger win than any on canelo's resume. neither have terrific resume, but they young fetuses.Comment
-
Exactly.Originally posted by Bushbaby
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
broner...demarco, perez, escobedo...Comment
-
IF Canelo beats Trout he still has to catch up with Broner. A Trout win is comparable to DeMarco but then Broner has Escobedo, Litzau, Perez and whoever else. Those were prime guys not shot to **** fighters with nothing but name value.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
You're cuckoo.
You will find yourself in a vast minority if you think Canelo has beaten anyone on par with Demarco.
That being said I really like Alvarez as a fighter and think he has way more potential than Broner. But if I am being honest Alvarez's opposition has been a complete and utter joke not only in lack of class but also in the fact that they have also been undersized and moving up in weight.
When Broner beat Demarco it was Broner moving up to defeat a reigning champion coming off 3 impressive victories.
I can't stand Broner, he is a ****. I like Alvarez, hope to see him do well. However, any non ****** who takes an unbiased look at the facts sees that Broner's resume is the more ambitious and impressive of the two (which isn't saying much for Broner)Comment
Comment